Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Attention: Effect of Breakdown

Many encyclopedia entries and introductory chapters written about attentional selection start by noting that our environment is rather rich in sensory stimulation that cannot possibly be processed simultaneously and there has to be a mechanism (attentional selection) that deals with this bombardment of sensory stimulation by processing only the relevant information. This statement is valid, but what is the evidence for this implied limited capacity (i.e., the breakdown of attention)? Perhaps you have had the experience of walking into a crowded café trying to find an empty table while holding a tray with hot soup and a sandwich. After quite a bit of searching around, you finally find a table and sit down to enjoy your food. But just as you are about to bite into your sandwich, a friend of yours comes by your table asking why you've ignored her waving at you. This example illustrates a simple yet startling fact—even though we may feel as if we perceive everything around us, the perceptual reality is that we are only aware of a small subset of sensory events at any single moment in time. The failure of attention, illustrated with this example, reflects the fact that most of the sensory information available in the physical world is actually not processed, and therefore is not available for conscious perception. This lack of conscious access to the sensory information present in the physical world is termed breakdown of attention. Such apparent breakdown, or limited capacity, arises because there is too much distraction from all the possible sensory input that competes for conscious perception. This entry focuses on instances that demonstrate the need for attentional selection, give examples of breakdowns of attentional selection, and briefly considers the fate of the information that failed to reach conscious perception.

Behavioral Phenomena

One of the most striking examples of the breakdown in the attentional system, caused by sensory overload, was demonstrated by Daniel Simmons and his colleagues. The authors conducted a series of experiments that revolved around a simple scenario—a young man (one of the experimenters) approaches a passerby (unsuspecting participant in this experiment) asking for directions on how to get to one of the buildings on campus. In the middle of the conversation, however, two people carrying a door (experimental accomplices) walk in between the experimenter and the participant briefly obstructing the participant's view of the experimenter. During the time that the experimenter was invisible to the subject, another person trades places with the experimenter, so that once the door has passed, the participant is left talking to a new person! This experiment found that only 50% of the participants noticed that, after the interruption, the identity of the person they were conversing with was switched, even though the two experimenters were dissimilar in build, had different haircuts, had different pitched voices, and wore dissimilar clothing. This example is particularly potent because the experiment was conducted not in the contrived laboratory environment, but rather in our natural environment (i.e., outside) with innocent bystanders serving as participants. In addition, this experiment was not conducted in the middle of a hustle and bustle of, say, Times Square (an environment that we often think of as being conducive to sensory overload). This experiment demonstrates a striking breakdown of attention in our day-to-day environment, even under conditions when part of the stimulus was attended (few would argue that two people who are carrying a conversation with one another do not, at least on some level, pay attention to each other's identity). The breakdown of attention in this experiment could be attributed to competition from a multitude of sensory and mental events related and unrelated to the actual task at hand of giving directions—for example, remembering the campus layout, remembering landmarks on the way, hearing birds chirping in the background, or feeling faint pain from a blister on the left foot. All these cognitive tasks place enormous constraints on attentional selection, ultimately resulting in a failure of perception.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading