Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Attention: Cognitive Influences

In 1880, William James famously defined attention as the mind taking possession of one out of several simultaneously possible objects or train of thoughts. The modern study of attention continues to work within this broad definition. It is generally accepted that an individual is only aware of a small fraction of the information provided to the brain by the sensory systems. Attention is the name given to the process that governs which material enters awareness and which does not. This entry focuses on how cognitive factors—goals and expectations of an observer—influence visual attention.

Whether a given stimulus is attended depends both on its inherent salience and the state of the observer. The interplay between these two factors is exemplified by the following two situations: (1) Imagine searching for a friend in a crowd. As one searches through the crowd, attention may be captured by elements that are inherently salient, for instance, a person in a red coat among people in black coats, or by dynamic cues such as a person running. However, where one looks in the crowd also depends on one's knowledge. So, if the friend is known to be wearing a black coat and a blue hat, attention may be less likely to be captured by an otherwise salient red coat, but perhaps be misdirected to a blue coat as one searches for anything blue in the crowd. (2) Imagine walking by a golf course and worrying about being hit by a golf ball. Although it is likely that a quickly moving white thing in one's visual field will be noticed under most circumstances, the act of walking by a golf course and worrying about being hit by a golf ball may lower the threshold for detecting quickly moving white things. Directing one's attention to blue things because blue is currently relevant and increasing sensitivity to detecting moving white things are instances of cognitive influences on attention. Traditional accounts of attention have placed little emphasis on such influences in comparison with factors that were thought to automatically capture attention (e.g., a red thing among black things). However, it can be argued that the purpose of visual attention is the selection of information most relevant to a present goal. Hence, the effects of goals, expectations, recent history, and even emotions on visual attention have become an area of active research.

Studying Attention: Behavioral Methods

A commonly used paradigm for studying visual attention is the eponymously named Posner cueing task. The basic version of the task requires subjects to press a button anytime they detect a small circle (the target) while looking at the center of a screen without moving their eyes. Before the appearance of the target, a light (the cue) flashes on the left or the right side of the screen. The location of the cue either coincides with the location of the subsequently appearing target (valid trials) or does not (invalid trials). The basic finding is that reaction times are shorter on valid trials than on uncued trials, and are slowest on invalid trials. The interpretation is that attention is automatically “deployed” to the cued region. Targets that appear in the attended region are processed faster than are targets appearing in an unattended region (which require an attentional shift from the previously cued region).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading