Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Feedback is a subset of the available information in the work environment that indicates how well individuals are meeting their goals. Thus feedback guides, motivates, and reinforces effective behaviors while simultaneously discouraging ineffective ones. Feedback is a complex stimulus entailing a process in which a sender conveys a message to a recipient regarding personal behavior at work. The presence of feedback triggers psychological processes that precede behavioral responses. Daniel R. Ilgen and colleagues outlined how psychological processes, such as recipients' perceptions of feedback, acceptance of feedback, desire to respond to feedback, and intended responses are influenced by such factors as the recipient's own characteristics, such as individual differences; characteristics of the source, including credibility; and characteristics of the feedback message, for example positive or negative sign.

Feedback has three primary uses in organizations. First, it can be used for employee development. Feedback can be used to communicate information to employees regarding their performance strengths and weaknesses so that they can be recognized for what they are doing well and can focus their efforts on areas that need improvement. A second use of feedback is for personnel decisions. For example, data from formal feedback sessions such as performance appraisals can be used to make decisions regarding who gets promoted, fired, or laid off. Finally, feedback can be used for documentation of organizational decisions. In particular, feedback records can be used to track employees' performance patterns over time; and these records can be used to protect organizations from lawsuits. These uses for feedback can be integrated into a comprehensive performance management system, which can be used to develop, motivate, and document employee behaviors.

Although feedback has traditionally been examined within the context of how it influences individual behaviors, more dynamic approaches have been recently adopted. In the following paragraphs, we review some of these perspectives to provide a more complete understanding of feedback processes in organizations.

Feedback Seeking Behavior

Moving beyond the view of the feedback target as a passive recipient of information, feedback has been conceptualized as an individual resource that people are motivated to actively seek. Originating in the work of Susan J. Ashford and Larry L. Cummings, this perspective portrays the workplace as an information environment in which individuals engage in feedback seeking behavior (FSB), enacting such strategies as monitoring the environment for feedback cues or making direct inquiries of actors in the environment in an effort to obtain personally relevant information.

A number of motivating factors can prompt an individual to engage in FSBs. First, feedback can reduce the uncertainty individuals experience regarding their roles or performance. Feedback can also serve an error corrective function and facilitate the attainment of competence or goal achievement. Furthermore, feedback has implications for self-evaluation and impression management. Individuals' desires to bolster their egos through obtaining positive feedback or, on the contrary, protect their egos by avoiding negative feedback can drive FSB. The greater the perceived value of feedback, the more proactive individuals will be in seeking it.

The costs perceived to accompany FSB can also affect the frequency of feedback seeking and the manner in which individuals pursue feedback. Costs of FSB are generally construed in terms of how much effort is necessary to acquire feedback information, concerns about image or loss of face, and the degree of inference required to make sense of feedback messages. Monitoring the feedback environment tends to necessitate less effort and invokes fewer image concerns than direct inquiry strategies. A trade-off exists between the accuracy and clarity of feedback and the effort and risk entailed in obtaining such feedback. Individuals desiring highly accurate feedback may forego the safer monitoring strategy in favor of inquiry. However, because feedback interpretation can be colored by such factors as recipient motives and expectations, even clearly communicated feedback messages can be misunderstood.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading