Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Performance appraisal refers to the systematic measurement and evaluation of employee work behaviors as part of an organization's performance management system. Performance appraisals typically focus on employee behaviors or performance dimensions that are required of the position and tend not to include discretionary employee behaviors. Reflecting social, political, and organizational changes, performance appraisal systems continue to evolve to serve many different individual and organizational purposes.

Brief History

Performance appraisals began to grow in popularity with the industrial revolution of the early 20th century. World War II fueled this interest as industrial psychologists were given the tasks of classifying and placing individuals in positions to increase the effectiveness of the military. Performance appraisals research continued following World War II and today remains a major focus of research in industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology. Performance appraisal research has gone through many phases throughout its history. The 1960s and 1970s were largely devoted to research on rating formats, the 1980s and early 1990s largely investigated issues related to rater cognitive processes, and recent research is devoted largely to 360-degree feedback or multirater systems. One constant challenge for researchers and practitioners has been the difficulty of defining and measuring job performance given its dynamic and multidimensional nature.

Variations in Approaches

Appraisals generally are classified into objective (e.g., sales volume) or subjective (e.g., supervisory ratings) measures, with the vast majority of performance appraisal systems using subjective measures of performance. Elements of the appraisal system that may differ across contexts or organizations include variations in rating purpose, rater sources, rating content and formats, and system characteristics.

Appraisal Purpose

Performance appraisals may be used for a variety of purposes, which may be classified into three categories: within-person, between-person, and system maintenance purposes. Within-person purposes involve identifying an employee's strengths or weaknesses to provide developmental feedback to the employee, set employee goals, or suggest particular training or development programs. Between-person purposes are used to make comparisons between employees and may be used to identify who should be promoted, administer merit pay increases, or decide which employees should be terminated. System maintenance purposes include using the appraisals to validate personnel selection assessments, identify organizational training needs, or document information pertaining to personnel decisions. Research indicates that the organizations often use performance appraisals for multiple purposes simultaneously, and the observed ratings and user attitudes differ as a function of rating purpose. Appraisal purpose is an important consideration given that it will direct how an organization's performance management system is developed, implemented, and maintained.

Rater Source

Supervisors are the most widely used source of performance appraisal information. Recent changes in how organizations are structured and function (e.g., flatter and more decentralized, organized around team-based work) have led many organizations to collect performance information from nonsupervisory sources. These rater sources may include peers, subordinates, or customers. Research indicates that different rater sources provide different information, and a more comprehensive assessment of work behaviors may be obtained by collecting information from multiple sources.

Rating Content and Format

Virtually any aspect of employee behavior, such as specific behaviors or outcomes, and any level of performance, whether individual or group, may be appraised. Early performance appraisal systems tended to focus on evaluating traits, whereas the current focus is on evaluating job-related behaviors. Performance appraisals generally evaluate past performance, but some forms may require raters to make predictions about potential or future performance. Rating formats may also differ across situations such that, for example, some formats requiring ratings and other formats require raters to rank-order employees.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading