Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Item response theory (IRT), also called latent trait theory, is a psychometric theory that was created to better understand how individuals respond to individual items on psychological and educational tests. The underlying theory is built around a series of mathematical formulas that have parameters that need to be estimated using complex statistical algorithms. These parameters relate to properties of individual items and characteristics of individual respondents. The term latent trait is used to describe IRT in that characteristics of individuals cannot be directly observed; they must be inferred by using certain assumptions about the response process that help estimate these parameters.

Item response theory complements and contrasts classical test theory (CTT), which is the predominant psychometric theory taught in undergraduate and graduate programs. Classical test theory differs from IRT in several ways that will be discussed throughout this entry. In general, though, IRT can be thought of as analogous to an electron microscope for item analysis, whereas CTT would be more like a traditional optical microscope. Both techniques are useful for their own purposes. Just like the electron microscope, IRT provides powerful measurement analysis; IRT is useful if you have a need for specific, precise analysis. On the other hand, CTT can be just as useful as IRT when the research questions are vague and general. In medical research, sometimes the optical microscope is preferred to the electron microscope. Likewise, CTT may be preferred in some situations.

The Item Response Function

Item response theory relates characteristics of items and characteristics of individuals to the probability of affirming, endorsing, or correctly answering individual items. The cornerstone of IRT is the item response function (IRF), which is the graphical representation of a mathematical formula that relates the probability of affirming item i with the value of a latent trait, θ. Figure 1 presents a graphical representation of a hypothetical IRF.

Figure 1 Graphical Representation of a Hypothetical Item Response Function

None

In Figure 1, the x-axis relates to the level of the characteristic being measured by the test. This trait, θ, is typically scored like a z score, with scores at zero being average and scores above zero being above average; scores below zero are below average. Typical θ distributions range from −3 to +3. The y-axis relates to the probability of affirming an item. For ability items, the y-axis measures the probability of answering an item correctly. For items without correct answers (e.g., attitude or personality items), the y-axis refers to the probability of choosing the keyed option (i.e., the option that taps high conscientiousness). The IRF relates the level of θ with probability of affirming the item. As can be seen in Figure 1, as θ increases, the probability of affirming the item also increases. This property of monotonicity is common with IRT models. As can be seen in Figure 1, an individual with a θ = 0 would have an expected probability of affirming the item of roughly 50%. The corresponding probabilities for a person of θ= −3 and θ= +3 are roughly 0% and 100%, respectively.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading