Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Organizational routines are repetitive, recognizable patterns of interdependent actions, carried out by multiple organizational actors. Organizational routines can be found in production, customer service, hiring, budgeting, strategy formation, and every other part of an organization.

Each aspect of the definition is important to the concept of organizational routines. Routines must be repetitive. If a pattern of actions occurs only once, it makes no sense to call it a routine. The pattern must also be recognizable, at least to the participants. Recognition of the pattern of actions allows participants to describe and account for their actions and to orient their actions to others. The actions must be interdependent, in the sense that accomplishing one action depends on another. In a typical routine, the flow of information or materials from one action to the next creates interdependence between the actions. Finally, for a routine to be called organizational, the actions must be carried out by multiple actors. Organizational routines are not just individual routines that are performed in the context of an organization.

The emphasis on repetitive patterns of action in the definition of routines has led many people to assume that organizational routines are stable and unchanging. Because routines exhibit stable qualities, they are often mentioned as a source of organizational inertia and resistance to change. Recent empirical research has provided evidence that flexibility and change are also important aspects of organizational routines. New ways of conceptualizing organizational routines have been developed in order to understand their simultaneous relation to both stability and change.

Organizational routines are considered by many scholars to be fundamental to the way work is accomplished in organizations. The flow of information and materials within a routine transforms organizational inputs into outputs. Because routines involve multiple actors in an organization, they are a primary mechanism for coordination. Because routines embody organizational capabilities, they are often viewed as a repository for organizational knowledge and a vehicle for organizational learning.

Conceptual Overview

Though organizational routines are often discussed both in the scholarly literature and in practice, they have been surprisingly difficult to conceptualize. Until recently, metaphors have dominated the conceptual terrain. These metaphors can be traced to the streams of research that have generated most of the scholarship on organizational routines. In this section, we review these early metaphors and contrast them with the current concept of routines as generative systems.

One stream emphasizes the relationship between organizational routines and decision making. Routines, from this perspective, are traces of implicit and explicit decisions about the processes of work. They are cognitive shortcuts that reduce uncertainty because they enable people to engage in a process without rethinking it. The emphasis on decision making and cognitive shortcuts has led to the metaphors of routines as habit and program.

A second stream of research takes an ecological approach that emphasizes the role of routines as genetic material for organizations. This perspective focuses on the rise and fall of types of organizations and of routines within populations of organizations as they compete for survival. The ecological approach has led to the metaphors of routines as skills and genes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading