Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Organizational economics provides insights into questions such as, Why do organizations exist? What are their boundaries? How do they work? and Why do they behave the way they do? It uses and draws on the theories of transaction cost, agency, property rights, team production, the evolutionary theory of the firm, and business strategy to study and explain organizations and organizational phenomena (e.g., boundaries and the internal working of the firm).

Conceptual Overview

Traditional economic theories do little to explain why organizations exist and why they are different. They take organizations as given and focus on their market interactions. They do not deal with the internal working of the organization, organizational goals, uncertainty, imperfect information, organizational complexity, or decision-making processes. Rather the organization is a black box used to transform inputs into outputs.

It was Coase who provided a point of departure for many of these theories by asking why organizations (firms) exist at all. Coase used transaction costs, the cost of using the market (costs of finding relative prices, writing and policing contracts, etc.) to explain not only the existence but also the boundary and the scope of organizations. By making certain resource allocation decisions within the domain of the organization rather than through the medium of the market, an organization can realize a saving in transaction costs. Organizational economics views the organization as an efficient institution that economizes on transaction costs. Therefore, it is more efficient to organize economic activities within an organization than through the price mechanism (market); that is, it depends on the relative efficiency of each mode. Coase's early insights have been extended by Williamson, who sees the organization as a nexus of contracts (a term coined by Jensen and Meckling) between a group of people who are working toward a common purpose of producing goods and services. These contractual relationships that bind the parties together also bring about the issues of incentives and monitoring, which influence the governance structure of the firm.

Transaction Cost Economics

Underlying the aforementioned insights is the notion that transaction costs describe organizations as governance structures. That is to say, transaction cost economics sees and describes firms as governance structures in organizational forms and not as production functions. Transaction cost economics focuses on transactions and the costs of carrying them out. The transaction is defined loosely as a transfer of good or service and is the unit of analysis. In a world of imperfect information, transaction costs are positive and rising, exchanges are governed, and some forms of governance are more efficient than others.

Organizations are then seen as hierarchical institutions in response to the presence of positive and rising transaction costs in the market. Certain costs are saved by removing them from the sphere of the market and bringing them within the boundary of the organization. The efficiency criterion of the transaction cost model determines the boundaries of the organization by internalizing transactions within the hierarchy (firm) when they are too costly to be carried out in the market. The key concepts that form the basis of transaction cost theory include bounded rationality (limitations on the individual's information processing abilities, i.e., cognitive abilities), opportunism (selfinterest seeking with guile), and asset specificity (specialization of assets with respect to use or users, assets whose value is higher in their current use than in alternative uses). These are also conditions inherent within organizations. The coexistence of these conditions poses efficiency problems for the price mechanism, thus leading to the emergence of the firm. Combining these conditions with environmental characteristics, uncertainty, and frequency, Williamson has elaborated on how different governance structures such as markets, hybrids, and firms can emerge. These governance structures are seen as responses to the nature and types of contract agreements. They are also employed to guard against the hazards of contracting and will vary depending on administrative controls, contract laws, and incentives.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading