Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A machine bureaucracy describes a form of organization in which the prime coordinating mechanism in the design of the organization is the standardization of work processes. The key features of a machine bureaucracy include design based on vertical and horizontal job specialization, functional grouping of activities, vertical centralization, limited horizontal decentralization, and efforts to sustain behavior formalization.

Conceptual Overview

The concept of a machine bureaucracy was described by Henry Mintzberg in relation to a specific type of organizational structural configuration. Other structural configurations include the simple configuration, the professional bureaucracy, the divisionalized form, and the adhocracy.

The machine bureaucracy is characterized by the routinization of work, with often simple routine repetitive tasks. This structure has the features of a bureaucratic organization first described by Max Weber, including standardized responsibilities, communication channels, and work rules and a well-defined hierarchy of authority. This structure has also been discussed by Gareth Morgan using the image of an organization as a machine having a mechanistic structure. Historically such an organization form was seen to develop with the rise of the factory system and the industrial revolution. Frederick Taylor's principles of management as well as many of the principles of the early classical management scholars reflected this mechanistic approach to structuring the organization.

Analysis of the Central Features of the Machine Bureaucracy

The structure of the machine bureaucracy has distinctive features. In the operating core of the organization—where the basic work related to production is carried out, there is a highly rationalized work flow. Operating tasks are simple and repetitive. A sharp division of labor can exist with jobs defined narrowly both vertically and horizontally and an emphasis on the formalization of behavior as the key design parameter. Because the machine bureaucracy depends primarily on the standardization of its operating work processes for coordination, the technical structure that houses the analysts who do the standardizing is a key part of the structure.

While the machine bureaucracy sharply distinguishes between line and staff with the line managers having the formal authority for the operating units, considerable informal power rests with the technocratic staff, for example, planners, budgeters, work study analysts, and so forth, who standardize everyone else's work. Machine bureaucracies' managers typically express an obsession with control, one result of which is that conflict tends not to be resolved but repressed. When conflict occurs, it usually explodes—in a flare-up, a wildcat strike, or something similar.

Formal power is expressed in pyramidal structures. Machine bureaucracies are usually associated with environments that are stable and simple, such as mass production firms in placid, rather than turbulent, environments.

Critical Commentary

As Henry Mintzberg, Gareth Morgan, and others note, no structure has evoked more heated debate than the machine bureaucracy. While some authors have seen the machine bureaucracy to be the embodiment of rationality, others have focused on the consequences of this form of organization for the experience of work and the ability of the organization to be flexible and innovative.

Gareth Morgan, for example, argues that mechanistic approaches to organization work well only under conditions where machines work well: when there is a straightforward task to perform, when the environment is stable enough to ensure that the products produced will be the appropriate ones, when one wishes to produce exactly the same product time and again, when precision is at a premium, and when the human “machine” parts are compliant and behave as they are designed to do. McDonald's is often used as an example of an organization that has been very successful using the mechanistic model. This approach to organization also led to George Ritzer's critique of the influence of this thinking in wider aspects of social life in his thesis about the McDonaldization of society.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading