Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Law and economics is a theory of law based on the proposition that legal rules can be interpreted as a system of incentives aimed at inducing people to behave in certain socially desirable ways. Underlying this view is a presumption that people are rational; that is, they respond to perceived costs and benefits in ways that further their self-interest. While such an assumption is standard in the analysis of market behavior, it is less obvious that it should also operate in the legal realm, especially in such areas as the common law of torts, family law, and criminal law, where financial or material gain are not necessarily the primary objectives. The application of economic analysis to these and many other areas of law has nevertheless proved extremely successful.

The so-called “new” law and economics is of relatively recent origin, emerging in the 1960s. Prior to that, the application of economic analysis to legal issues (the “old” law and economics) was primarily limited to the field of antitrust law, or the legal regulation of markets. But when Ronald Coase published a classic article on social cost in 1960, Guido Calabresi applied economic principles to tort law in 1961, and Gary Becker developed an economic analysis of criminal law in 1968, the stage was set for the application of economic theory to an ever-expanding array of legal fields not obviously economic in nature.

Conceptual Overview

Regardless of the particular area to which it is applied, economic analysis of law is aimed at answering two kinds of questions: What is the effect of a particular legal rule on human behavior? And, is that effect socially desirable? Examples of the first type of question, referred to as positive analysis, include questions such as these: Will enactment of a three-strikes rule deter more crimes? Does an increase in manufacturer liability lead to safer consumer products?

A stronger and more controversial version of positive analysis asserts that the common law—that body of law made by judges—tends to be efficient in the sense that it promotes an efficient allocation of resources. Advocates of this view qualify this claim in two ways: First, efficiency is not the conscious goal of judges but instead emerges as an unintended outcome of the legal process (much as efficiency emerges from the ordinary operation of competitive markets), and second, not all laws are efficient at any point in time. This second point suggests a role for economic analysis in making the law more efficient. This is the purpose of normative analysis, which relies on the proposition that economic efficiency is a valid social norm for evaluating and improving the law.

The Coase Theorem

Many scholars date the origin of the new law and economics to Coase's analysis of the role of legal rules in promoting efficiency in the presence of market failure. Prior to Coase, economists assumed that external costs like pollution could only be corrected by direct government regulation of markets, a tradition linked to Arthur Pigou. Coase's analysis changed that by emphasizing the role of property rights and bargaining in determining the ultimate allocation of resources. In particular, Coase argued that as long as property rights are well defined and transaction costs are low, bargaining among the parties to an external harm can result in an efficient abatement of the harm. Further, the efficient outcome will be achieved regardless of how property rights are initially assigned (that is, whether victims have the right to be free from harm or injurers have the right to impose it). This result, known as the Coase Theorem, suggests that market processes potentially eliminate the need for government intervention in the presence of externalities.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading