Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The glass ceiling is a term coined by the Wall Street Journal in 1986, and is a metaphor used to describe the condition that keeps women and minorities from reaching senior positions in both public and private sector organizations in America and across the globe. The term was rapidly picked up and has been used more recently, and more analytically, by Davidson and Burke in 2004, Powell and Graves in 2003, and Thompson and Graham in 2005. According to the International Labor Organization, who has adopted the glass ceiling nomenclature, women have more difficulty obtaining top jobs than those lower in the hierarchy. Thus, a rough rule of thumb is that the higher one looks in an organization's hierarchy, the fewer the women and minorities there will be. Thus, the term glass ceiling is used to reflect the ability of women and minorities to view the world above them, but the metaphorical ceiling prevents women and minorities from accessing the senior positions they can only view. This glass ceiling effect occurs when women and minorities with credentials that are equivalent to those of white men, i.e., those who traditionally occupy positions of prestige, authority, and power within organizations, are prevented from accessing top jobs simply because they are women or minorities, a usage that has been explored in Davidson's work of 1997; Powell's contribution of 1999; and Konrad, Prasad, and Pringle's 2006 publication. As the glass is clear, women and minority groups may be unaware at first that a barrier exists—because they can see through the barrier—but as they attempt to progress through the organization, the glass ceiling becomes a very real barrier to their career development, while seemingly not there for people from privileged male and nonminority statuses. In this respect, the metaphor of a glass ceiling, although now conventional, is not altogether apposite, as the ceiling varies in porosity depending on who tries to move through it, while glass does not.

Conceptual Overview

Does the Glass Ceiling Exist in Organizations?

The proportion of women in management has increased over the past three decades in almost all countries, and legislation in some countries (e.g., affirmative action legislation in the United States and Canada) has contributed to this trend, as Powell and Graves documented in 2003. Despite this encouraging increase, recent research by Catalyst in 2005 has highlighted that the glass ceiling is firmly in place. In the United States, women held 50.3% of all management and professional positions in 2005, yet only 7.9% of Fortune 500 top earners and 1.4% of Fortune 500 CEOs were women. In the United Kingdom, 78 Financial Times Share Index (FTSE 100) companies in 2005 had women directors, up 13% from the previous year. However, only 11 FTSE 100 companies had female executive directors, which was below the 2002 figure, and 22 of the FTSE 100 boards in 2005 were all-male (see the discussion and data in Singh and Vinnicombe's 2005 study).

These statistics largely reflect the experiences of white women. It is important to highlight that black and ethnic minority women across the globe often face significant barriers. Although there is a general lack of data on ethnicity and employment, black and ethnic minority women are underrepresented at senior and professional levels in the labor market, as the UK Commission for Racial Equality documented in 2006. In the United Kingdom in 2004, for example, 17% of ethnic minority men were managers or senior officials, compared to 10% of ethnic minority women. The highest percentages of women and men in these positions were Indian and Chinese. Furthermore, in some countries such as South Africa, women of all races are disadvantaged and hardly any hold senior positions, especially in the corporate world, according to Mathur-Helm in 2005. Similarly, in China, 47% of the labor force is female, yet very few are in managerial roles, as Fang-Lee Cooke recorded in 2005. Thus, despite encouraging trends in some countries, women are still comparatively absent from managerial roles, and those who are in management tend to be in lowerlevel managerial positions.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading