Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Contingent employment has received great attention in both public and academic debates during the last decade. The concept of contingent employment stems from the U.S. term contingent work. The U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) has conducted the most comprehensive studies of contingent employment. The result of the BLS researchers' efforts to find more “effective measures” of contingent employment was what could be called a bottom-up definition of contingent workers: individuals who do not perceive themselves as having an explicit or implicit contract for continuing employment. Based on this definition, a special survey of contingent and alternative arrangements was conducted as a supplement to the 1995 Current Population Survey (CPS), a survey of households that is a primary source of information on the American workforce. Since then, similar studies have been made every second year. These efforts have certainly raised the awareness and the level of discussion regarding contingent employment in the U.S. context. In Europe, similar efforts are nonexistent. Instead, most studies of contingent employment use national Labor Force Survey (LFS) data, allowing measurement and analysis of the distribution of various forms of temporary work.

Contingent employment is here used as a unifying concept for all types of employment relationships that may be terminated with minimal costs from the point of view of the employer. This includes all types of contractual relationships that both parties may regard as limited in time, i.e., employees working on limited duration contracts (LDCs), working through temporary work agencies (TWAs), or those who are self-employed. Compared to the BLS definition of contingent work, this definition is broader and more relevant when comparing developments in the European labor markets. Thus, the term contingent employment is here used to signify what in the U.S. context is generally referred to as alternative work arrangements.

Conceptual Overview

There is an emerging academic literature on contingent employment. It includes both studies based on empirical research and theoretical attempts to explain the developments or comment on the implications for workers and labor markets in general. The majority of empirical research on contingent employment has been primarily descriptive, reporting statistics on the demographic characteristics of contingent workers or the incidence of contingent labor in the labor market. Some studies have gone beyond descriptive statistics in explaining the use of contingent labor, but several of these have significant limitations.

A review of both theoretical and empirical studies of contingent employment reveals much diversity. On the one hand, contingent employment typically is regarded as a management issue. Contingent employment is often said to have considerable positive effects on organizational performance, profitability, and flexibility. The use of contingent labor is often regarded as an opportunity to enhance management's ability to structure the workforce and deploy and redeploy workers in line with changes in production requirements. Furthermore, the use of contingent workers may provide an opportunity to achieve cost effectiveness. Moreover, the extended use of contingent labor implies a growing organizational complexity, including differentiation of the labor force, multiple forms of contracts, and the introduction of variable administrative forms of control over workers.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading