Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Actor-network theory (ANT), also known as sociology of translation, is a body of work developed by a group of sociologists associated with the Centre de Sociologie de I'Innovation in Paris. The main researchers within this group are Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, and John Law. Initially, they were engaged with the study of scientific work. The focus of ANT was the ways in which scientists and researchers simultaneously rebuild and link the social and the natural contexts upon which they act. With its understanding of the nature of scientific work and the role of the scientists in this process, ANT found an increased popularity not only in the area of science studies but also in cultural, political, and feminist studies, as well as constructionist social psychology and elsewhere. In particular, it has strongly influenced research on a number of sociological issues, such as the nature of agency, the relationship between agency and structure, and the nature of power. As such, it is seen by some as an alternative social theory, which is concerned with the mechanisms of power. Empirically, ANT focuses on the study of heterogonous actors and their relationships. Its origins are mixed, including semiotics, phenomenology, and ethnomethodology.

Conceptual Overview

Callon and Latour see the origin of ANT in the need for a new social theory adjusted to science and technology studies. Latour, and later on other researchers within this approach, argues that science is politics by other means and there is no special scientific method that guarantees true knowledge and is not influenced by power. Rather, knowledge, including scientific knowledge, as well as agents, social institutions, machines, and organizations, may be seen as products or effects of a network of heterogeneous materials or entities.

Initially, ANT researchers followed the work of scientists and analyzed their day-to-day work in order to reveal the real nature of knowledge and science. In a number of ethnographic studies of laboratory science, they outlined how scientists are constantly engaged in juxtaposition of heterogeneous elements, such as manipulations of test animals, interaction with colleagues, laboratory directors and suppliers, reading letters, taking trips to libraries, drafting papers, going to conferences, and writing grant applications. In the course of a typical working day, scientists organize and try to impose coherence on all these materials and activities with the goal to receive some profit from them (i.e., in the form of successful publications). Thus, scientific work is like building up of a story or a version of the world that involves the careful management of these heterogeneous elements. Furthermore, with the help of stories based on texts or inscriptions, such as outputs from recorders, laboratory notebooks, graphs, computer printouts, and published scientific articles, scientists extend their influence over their immediate environment. Such scientific inscriptions are powerful when they contain links to other texts, work, and institutions, and as such make possible the construction of linkages between different entities and the formation of new entities. The success of scientific inscriptions depends on the ability of their authors to enroll others so that the latter accept the picture proposed to them in the text. A successful enrolment gives the authors access to further resources, such as grants and recognition.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading