Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cohen and Levinthal introduced the notion of absorptive capacity in 1990. The notion of absorptive capacity refers to the capacity of the recipient to assimilate value and use the knowledge transferred. The higher the absorptive capacity, the better the firm is at understanding the knowledge received and thus can unlock and capture the intrinsic value of such knowledge and apply it for commercial purposes. This is related to the concepts of strategic knowledge serendipity and strategic knowledge arbitrage, elaborated by Carayannis and colleagues in both 2003 and 2006.

In 1998, Kim identified two components of absorptive capacity, namely prior knowledge and intensity of effort, and distinguished between the ability to learn new knowledge and the ability to use new knowledge in problem solving. Absorptive capacity is a limit to the rate or quantity of scientific or technological information and knowledge that an organization can effectively and productively internalize and use.

If such limits exist, they provide, for example, one incentive for firms to develop internal research and development (R&D) capacities. R&D departments can not only conduct development along lines they are already familiar with, but they have formal training and external professional connections that make it possible for them to evaluate and incorporate externally generated technical knowledge into the firm better than others in the firm can. In other words, a partial explanation for R&D investments by firms is to work around the absorptive capacity constraints they are confronted with.

Conceptual Overview

The creation and transfer of knowledge within an organization has increasingly become a critical factor in that organization's success and competitiveness. Studies done in various organizations found that the two main knowledge activities that need to be balanced are the creation of knowledge and the transferring of knowledge across time and space. Many organizations are now concentrating their efforts on how knowledge can be transferred throughout the organization.

Increasingly important in the global organizations, such as the World Bank, attention has been given to the means by which knowledge is transferred to developing countries. This is seen to be particularly important in the development domain where knowledge is a large, critical, and changing component of policy-making processes.

Knowledge transfer is now considered a facilitator, and hence a necessary process, in the context of economic reform and adjustment for developing countries. Its major contribution is that it allows developing governments to access knowledge that is otherwise outside their reach. However, there are costs associated with knowledge transfer, possibly lowering the extent of efficient knowledge transfer. The costs of knowledge transfer between expert organization and recipient countries are little explored by researchers, as Szulanski noted in 1996. Thus, keeping the transfer costs down must be in the interest of both expert organizations and recipient countries. Cost determinants may arise in the institutional arrangement, which refers to the institutional framework of the agents' interaction (in this case the interaction between government and an international development organization), and in the institutional environment, that is, contextual characteristics under which the knowledge transfer process takes place.

Moreover, Carayannis and colleagues in 2002 showed empirically, through longitudinal, time-series-data-based analysis, that there can be too little as well as too much technological learning taking place in firms. This is directly related to their intrinsic absorptive capacity in that learning activities may initially improve performance, but that there is some limit to a firm's absorptive capacity for learning. Larger increments of technological learning begin to depress performance, until a new critical point is reached and performance again improves. This suggests the presence of an optimal learning absorption bandwidth for each firm, where learning activities should not exceed the absorptive capacity of the firm but also must be sufficient to sustain improved performance.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading