Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Venture Capital
Since the late 1990s, venture capitalists (VCs) have steadily funded emerging nanotechnology, investing an all-time peak of $1.4 billion in 2008. However, like other segments of the global economy, VCs didn't escape the wrath of the 2008 recession. In fact, VCs slashed nanotechnology funding by 42 percent in 2009. To quantify the impact and the latest trends, Lux Research analyzed its database of primary interviews with start-ups and financiers, and scoured other sources like Capital IQ, and found interesting data regarding nanotech-based deals through December 14, 2009.
VCs tightened their purse strings by 42 percent relative to 2008, doling out only $792 million. In fact, 2009 marked the first year in this decade that investments dropped significantly (2007 deal value fell 1.7 percent, relative to 2006, to $773 million). On the flip side, the number of deals in 2009 increased slightly from 85 in 2008 to 92 in 2009, as VCs looked beyond the popular start-ups of 2008 and distributed the wealth more broadly.
VCs also bid farewell to mega deals, slicing the average deal size by 41 percent, to $8.6 million. In 2008, VCs invested 38 percent of their funds in three companies—A123Systems ($102 million), Pacific Biosciences ($120 million), and Nanosolar ($300 million)—driving the average deal size to an all-time high of $16.2 million. What a difference a year makes, as 2009 deal sizes fell to values last seen in 2000.
While not as concentrated as 2008, VCs favored a short list that included old stalwarts like A123Systems and Pacific Biosciences, as well as lesser known specialists like Nextreme Thermal Solutions. Ten companies pocketed 52 percent of all funding. Furthermore, like Pacific Biosciences, six of the firms on the top-10 list target healthcare and life sciences applications.
The healthcare and life sciences sector saved the day, as it grew 42 percent to $404 million. With deals in the manufacturing, materials, energy, and environment sectors sinking 78 percent and 69 percent, respectively, investments in the healthcare and life sciences sector—such as Lux Biosciences' $50 million haul—provided a cushion for the overall drop in investments. After two years of dominance by the energy and environment sector, healthcare and life sciences roared back to the top in 2009.
Series D or later investments tumbled a whopping 73 percent to $235 million. After a year of triple digit investments in single companies—such as Nanosolar's $300 million in 2008—the Series D walls came falling down in 2009. Moreover, with Series B rounds surging 49 percent to $339 million, it almost reached parity with Series C and later round, which collected $376 million. Like 2008, Series A walked away with the smallest portion at 7 percent or $56 million.
The United States captured the gold again, snagging 84 percent of the pie. Following a common trend throughout the decade, VC's focused on U.S.-based companies, showering them with $668 million. As usual, European-based companies followed, bringing in $108 million.
Conclusion
After reviewing nanotech VC transactions in 2009, Lux Research found the following:
- Relative to 2008, VCs reduced funding 42 percent to $792 million.
- Average deal
...
- Art, Design, and Materials
- Bionanotechnology Centers
- Context
- Clinton, William J.
- Converging Technologies
- Feynman, Richard
- Fullerene
- Human Enhancement
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Microscopy, Atomic Force
- Microscopy, Electron (Including TEM and SEM)
- Microscopy, Exotic
- Microscopy, Optical
- Microscopy, Scanning Probe
- Microscopy, Scanning Tunneling
- Nanobiotechnology
- Nanohype
- Nanomaterials
- Nanotech Chronicles, The
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Prey
- Roco, Mihail
- Self-Replication
- Social Movements and Nanoscience
- Technology Assessment
- Technoscience
- Economics and Business
- Agrifood
- Artificial Intelligence
- Benny the Bear
- Commercial Incubators
- Commercialization
- Competitiveness and Technonationalism
- Computational Nanotechnology
- Consumer Products Inventory
- Corporate Research and Development
- Electronics and Information Technology
- Energy
- Entrepreneurs in Nanoscience
- Export Controls
- Food
- Food Packaging
- General Purpose Technology
- Globalization
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- L'Oréal
- Lux Research
- Magic Nano
- Market Projections
- Market Resistance and Acceptance
- Nano-Bible
- NanoBusiness Alliance
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanointermediaries in Commerce
- Nanomanufacturing
- Nanomaterials in Commerce
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotechnology in Manufacturing
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Patent Class
- Patents
- Publicly Traded Nanofirms
- Titanium Dioxide
- Venture Capital
- Workers' Rights
- Workforce Development and Training
- Zinc Oxide
- Engagement and the Public
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Consensus Conference on Nanotechnology
- Democs
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- Hyle
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Nanoforum
- Nanologues
- Nanoscale Undergraduate Education Program
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering
- National Citizens' Technology Forum
- Popular Culture
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Understanding of Nanotechnology
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Public Well-Being
- Science Cafés
- Environment and Risk
- “Grey Goo” Scenario
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Desalinization
- Environment Canada
- Environmental Benefits
- Environmental Defense Fund
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Germany)
- Green Nanotechnology
- Health and Environmental Risks (Netherlands)
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- International Risk Governance Council
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Magic Nano
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Nano Risk Framework
- Nanomedicine, Toxicity Issues of
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotech Environmental, Health, and Safety Roadmap
- Nanotoxicology
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement (U.S.)
- Risk Amplification
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Attenuation
- Risk Communication
- Risk Governance
- Risk Management
- Risk-Benefit Perceptions of Nanotechnology
- Water Purification
- Ethics and Values
- Access
- Bioethics
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Codes of Conduct, Corporate
- Codes of Conduct, Professional
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Equity
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- Journal of Lutheran Ethics
- Nano-Ethics
- NanoEthics
- Nanoethics Group
- NanoEthics Network
- NanoEthicsBank
- Nanomedicine, Ethical Issues of
- Nanoscientists as Moral Agents
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- Neuroethics
- Privacy
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Security
- Speculative Ethics
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- Geographies and Distribution
- Argentina
- Australia
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Brazil
- California
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Canada
- China
- European Union
- France
- Geopolitical Implications
- Germany
- Global Value Chains
- Globalization
- Grenoble
- India
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- Iran
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Mexico
- Nanodistricts
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Victoria
- Netherlands
- New York
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Russia
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Trade Secrets and Nanotechnology
- United Kingdom
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- United States
- Governance
- 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act of 2003
- Anticipatory Governance
- Arms Control
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Congressional Nanotechnology Caucus
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Department of Agriculture (U.S.)
- Department of Defense (U.S.)
- Department of Energy (U.S.)
- Department of Health (UK)
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Germany)
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
- Food and Consumer Goods Authority (Netherlands)
- Food and Drug Administration (U.S.)
- German Research Foundation
- Governance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congressional
- Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency
- Law
- Ministry of Defence (UK)
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (Brazil)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (South Korea)
- Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies
- Moratorium
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Promotion Act of 2002 (South Korea)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (U.S.)
- National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Development Plan (South Korea)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Canada)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- National Toxicology Program (U.S.)
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Reflexive Governance
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Risk Governance
- Sixth Framework Programme
- Technological Determinism
- Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
- Toxic Substances Control Act and Nanotechnology
- Woodrow Wilson International Center
- History and Philosophy
- “Nano Culture”
- Bainbridge, William
- Control
- Converging Technologies
- Drexler, K. Eric
- Emergence
- Engines of Creation
- Feynman, Richard
- Future
- Historical Examples of Nanomaterials
- History-in-the-Making
- IBM
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- Joy, Bill
- Kabbalah
- Kroto, Sir Harry
- Kurzweil, Ray
- L5 Society
- Nanophilosophy
- Nordmann, Alfred
- Novelty
- Roco, Mihail
- Smalley, Richard
- Taniguchi, Norio
- Transhumanism
- Integration and Interdisciplinarity
- Nanotechnology Companies
- Nanotechnology Organizations
- Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Forum
- Australia Nanobusiness Forum
- Australian Office of Nanotechnology
- Australian Research Council Nanotechnology Network
- Canadian NanoBusiness Alliance
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center for Responsible Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Commission for Atomic Energy (France)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization
- Community Research and Development Information Service
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Nanotechnology and Society Network
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Latin American Nanotechnology and Society Network (Mexico)
- Nanobase
- Nanoparticle Occupational Safety and Health Consortium
- Nanotechnology Business Alliance
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- Nanotechnology Enterprise
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Group
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Institute (ASME)
- Nanotechnology Issues Dialogue Group (UK)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- NanoTrust Project (Austria)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- Society for Nanoscience and Technology
- VISION Online
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches