Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

It is the duty of the federal government to set appropriate standards, guidelines, and regulations to protect the public and the environment. The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) program was established in fiscal year 2001 to coordinate federal nanotechnology research and development. Under the purview of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), a cabinet-level council through which the president coordinates technological, scientific, and space policies, NNI is charged with providing a national long-term vision of nanotechnology. This includes regulating nanomaterials and nanoscience. The United States has no central regulatory body responsible for the regulation of nanomaterials and nanotechnology. Rather, given the multidisciplinary nature of nanoscience (i.e., engineering, chemistry, medicine), the regulation of nanomaterials and nanotechnology is under the purview of the responsible existing regulatory agency pertaining to the type of work being performed or the type of materials being produced. The result is a highly decentralized regulatory framework.

Currently, the NNI consists of 25 federal agencies working individually or jointly in a wide range of research and regulatory roles. Government regulation of nanomaterials falls under no less than six separate governmental agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the National Science Foundation (NSF). While EPA, the FDA, and NIOSH are dealing with the promulgation of regulations, agencies such as NIH and NSF are sponsoring important research to determine the public health risks posed by nanomaterials.

NIST is working to develop a database of characteristics and potential health and environmental hazards of nanomaterials. This is necessary to ensure the quality of data and usefulness of results generated in research involving the effects of nanomaterials in the environment. Accurate measurements can also eliminate uncertainties that may complicate regulatory and policy decisions.

The current state of regulation focuses almost primarily on the public heath risks posed by nanomaterials and how to properly determine and assess those risks. This focus is similar to that in the chemical industry and uses a process known as risk assessment. Risk assessment requires the weighing of potential risks posed to health and the environment against the value of the product in commerce. In the United States, chemicals are regulated by the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). In Europe, they are regulated by a process known as the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH). Concentration on risk assessment is being performed by the various federal agencies.

Environmental Protection Agency

EPA holds the position that the current statutory scheme provides it with the authority to regulate nanomaterials. While nanotechnology holds the possibility of environmental hazards to society, EPA recognizes that it also offers the possibility of aiding in remediation, and future regulations will likely reflect this. Thus, the challenge for EPA is to help society fully realize the benefits of nanotechnology while identifying and minimizing any adverse impacts to humans or ecosystems from exposure to nanomaterials.

Currently, EPA's viewpoint is that the risk assessment used by it for conventional chemicals is generally applicable to nanomaterials. However, EPA has not made any indication that current regulations would be adjusted to reflect different triggering levels when dealing with nanomaterials. Current regulations are triggered at specific measurable levels, such as weight, parts per million, or other quantifiable descriptions, which may be wholly inapplicable to nanomaterials. Given the distinct characteristics of nanomaterials, smaller measures will likely be required to trigger safety regulations. EPA recognizes that there are gaps in knowledge regarding nanomaterials and their possible harm to health and environmental. The current EPA approach is to develop sound risk assessment before developing specific regulatory schemes, based on information currently being sought by the government and various other stakeholders. As part of the process, EPA identified four key research themes it could address to develop statutes for which EPA is responsible. These four research themes are (1) sources, fate, transport, and exposure; (2) human health and ecological research to inform risk assessment and test methods; (3) risk assessment methods and case studies; and (4) preventing and mitigating risks.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading