Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Food and Drug Administration (U.S.)
The widening social impact of nanotechnology made itself felt on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2006 when eight environmental and consumer activist groups petitioned the agency to remove sunscreen using nano-zinc oxide from the market. Sunscreen manufacturers maintained that there was no difference between regular zinc oxide, which had been used safely for years, and its smaller nano-sized counterpart. The only difference they maintained was that the optical properties of zinc oxide which, when rendered on the nanoscale, become transparent. To them, this property was a benefit since more consumers would be willing to wear a sunscreen if it went on the skin invisibly.
Consumer and environmental groups, however, were dismayed that this untested form of zinc oxide would be marketed to families and their children, when such little research was known about the safety and efficacy of nano-zinc oxide. They questioned not only whether it worked as safely and effectively as the original zinc oxide, but also whether the diminutive particle size could cross skin cell barriers and pose longer-term health risks. Moreover, they were concerned with the possible environmental consequences of the particles being dispersed through oceans, lakes, and waterways. Although the FDA maintains it knows of no health risks associated with nano-zinc or nano-titanium oxide, it participates in ongoing toxicology and phytotoxicity studies in collaboration with several other agencies. The difficulty in reaching an assessment of the basic safety and efficacy of a nanoparticle like nano-zinc oxide underscores the regulatory and scientific complexity of nanotechnology.
Largely in response to the public's demand for more FDA oversight, then commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach convened a Nanotechnology Task Force to assess the potential scientific and policy issues that nanotechnology presented the FDA. By July 2007, the FDA released its findings of its Nanotechnology Task Force. Noting the rapid growth in many sectors of nanotechnology and the potential impact upon almost all of the products and activities that come under FDA jurisdiction, the report recommended that the FDA develop its institutional capacity for handling nanotechnology.
To this end, the report recommended that the FDA begin to foster in-house expertise regarding nanotechnology, while simultaneously developing the techniques necessary to identify and assess the safety and effectiveness of nanotechnology. Indeed, the report noted that because safety and effectiveness may vary with changes in molecular size, the report suggested that nanotechnology might present specific challenges different from other emerging technologies. Moreover, because of this complexity, the report urged the FDA to develop transparent, consistent, and predictable regulatory tracks so that the FDA could ensure both private and public stakeholders that its practices were equitable, supporting both innovation and protecting public health.
The task force also surveyed the existing authorities for the FDA and noted that the FDA was best positioned to oversee the safety and efficacy of products requiring premarket approval (drugs, medical devices, biological products, food additives), whereas its ability to oversee and protect consumers from possible harm was not as comprehensive for products not requiring premarket approval (cosmetics, food ingredients that are generally recognized as safe [GRAS], dietary supplements). In turn, the report recommends that the FDA foster private-public relationships, data sharing, and provide guidance to manufacturers and researchers. Notably, the report also suggests that the addition of nanotechnology to already-existing products may require the submission of additional information, change its regulatory classification, even alter its regulatory pathway. Because of these possible contingencies, the report recommends that manufacturers establish communication with the agency early on in the research and development phase of a product.
...
- Art, Design, and Materials
- Bionanotechnology Centers
- Context
- Clinton, William J.
- Converging Technologies
- Feynman, Richard
- Fullerene
- Human Enhancement
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Microscopy, Atomic Force
- Microscopy, Electron (Including TEM and SEM)
- Microscopy, Exotic
- Microscopy, Optical
- Microscopy, Scanning Probe
- Microscopy, Scanning Tunneling
- Nanobiotechnology
- Nanohype
- Nanomaterials
- Nanotech Chronicles, The
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Prey
- Roco, Mihail
- Self-Replication
- Social Movements and Nanoscience
- Technology Assessment
- Technoscience
- Economics and Business
- Agrifood
- Artificial Intelligence
- Benny the Bear
- Commercial Incubators
- Commercialization
- Competitiveness and Technonationalism
- Computational Nanotechnology
- Consumer Products Inventory
- Corporate Research and Development
- Electronics and Information Technology
- Energy
- Entrepreneurs in Nanoscience
- Export Controls
- Food
- Food Packaging
- General Purpose Technology
- Globalization
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- L'Oréal
- Lux Research
- Magic Nano
- Market Projections
- Market Resistance and Acceptance
- Nano-Bible
- NanoBusiness Alliance
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanointermediaries in Commerce
- Nanomanufacturing
- Nanomaterials in Commerce
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotechnology in Manufacturing
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Patent Class
- Patents
- Publicly Traded Nanofirms
- Titanium Dioxide
- Venture Capital
- Workers' Rights
- Workforce Development and Training
- Zinc Oxide
- Engagement and the Public
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Consensus Conference on Nanotechnology
- Democs
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- Hyle
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Nanoforum
- Nanologues
- Nanoscale Undergraduate Education Program
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering
- National Citizens' Technology Forum
- Popular Culture
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Understanding of Nanotechnology
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Public Well-Being
- Science Cafés
- Environment and Risk
- “Grey Goo” Scenario
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Desalinization
- Environment Canada
- Environmental Benefits
- Environmental Defense Fund
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Germany)
- Green Nanotechnology
- Health and Environmental Risks (Netherlands)
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- International Risk Governance Council
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Magic Nano
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Nano Risk Framework
- Nanomedicine, Toxicity Issues of
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotech Environmental, Health, and Safety Roadmap
- Nanotoxicology
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement (U.S.)
- Risk Amplification
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Attenuation
- Risk Communication
- Risk Governance
- Risk Management
- Risk-Benefit Perceptions of Nanotechnology
- Water Purification
- Ethics and Values
- Access
- Bioethics
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Codes of Conduct, Corporate
- Codes of Conduct, Professional
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Equity
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- Journal of Lutheran Ethics
- Nano-Ethics
- NanoEthics
- Nanoethics Group
- NanoEthics Network
- NanoEthicsBank
- Nanomedicine, Ethical Issues of
- Nanoscientists as Moral Agents
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- Neuroethics
- Privacy
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Security
- Speculative Ethics
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- Geographies and Distribution
- Argentina
- Australia
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Brazil
- California
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Canada
- China
- European Union
- France
- Geopolitical Implications
- Germany
- Global Value Chains
- Globalization
- Grenoble
- India
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- Iran
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Mexico
- Nanodistricts
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Victoria
- Netherlands
- New York
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Russia
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Trade Secrets and Nanotechnology
- United Kingdom
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- United States
- Governance
- 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act of 2003
- Anticipatory Governance
- Arms Control
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Congressional Nanotechnology Caucus
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Department of Agriculture (U.S.)
- Department of Defense (U.S.)
- Department of Energy (U.S.)
- Department of Health (UK)
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Germany)
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
- Food and Consumer Goods Authority (Netherlands)
- Food and Drug Administration (U.S.)
- German Research Foundation
- Governance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congressional
- Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency
- Law
- Ministry of Defence (UK)
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (Brazil)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (South Korea)
- Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies
- Moratorium
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Promotion Act of 2002 (South Korea)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (U.S.)
- National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Development Plan (South Korea)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Canada)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- National Toxicology Program (U.S.)
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Reflexive Governance
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Risk Governance
- Sixth Framework Programme
- Technological Determinism
- Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
- Toxic Substances Control Act and Nanotechnology
- Woodrow Wilson International Center
- History and Philosophy
- “Nano Culture”
- Bainbridge, William
- Control
- Converging Technologies
- Drexler, K. Eric
- Emergence
- Engines of Creation
- Feynman, Richard
- Future
- Historical Examples of Nanomaterials
- History-in-the-Making
- IBM
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- Joy, Bill
- Kabbalah
- Kroto, Sir Harry
- Kurzweil, Ray
- L5 Society
- Nanophilosophy
- Nordmann, Alfred
- Novelty
- Roco, Mihail
- Smalley, Richard
- Taniguchi, Norio
- Transhumanism
- Integration and Interdisciplinarity
- Nanotechnology Companies
- Nanotechnology Organizations
- Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Forum
- Australia Nanobusiness Forum
- Australian Office of Nanotechnology
- Australian Research Council Nanotechnology Network
- Canadian NanoBusiness Alliance
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center for Responsible Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Commission for Atomic Energy (France)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization
- Community Research and Development Information Service
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Nanotechnology and Society Network
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Latin American Nanotechnology and Society Network (Mexico)
- Nanobase
- Nanoparticle Occupational Safety and Health Consortium
- Nanotechnology Business Alliance
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- Nanotechnology Enterprise
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Group
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Institute (ASME)
- Nanotechnology Issues Dialogue Group (UK)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- NanoTrust Project (Austria)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- Society for Nanoscience and Technology
- VISION Online
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches