Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Disruptive Technology
The term disruptive technology indicates technologies that cause imbalances and disruptions in the logic of production of a product or the conception and application of a service. The semantic space of this expression denotes technologies that cause an inflexion or interruption in the continuity of traditional production factors. In terms of innovation and business, this notion sparks the argument that, more than price reductions, it is new ideas that drive entrepreneurial logic and competitive companies. In a society based on knowledge it is vital in research agendas to understand the dynamics and connections between technological innovation and the strong changes in the manufacturing and service industries. In a given innovation context, disruptive technologies press for changes in the way objects are made and sold. They can provide the same services of a prior technology with lower costs and greater applicability, or surpass, in terms of functionality, effectiveness, and economic impact, an entire segment of the market.
The Ways of Innovation and Technological Paths
After the second half of the 20th century, science and technology experienced an accelerated growth pace. Technoscience became an important component in promoting wealth. The economic, social, and environmental implications of this acceleration are inseparable from development and, deriving from analyses made by the business administration sector, their analytical use is inseparable from certain technologies and innovations. A set of technologies—atomic/nuclear, semiconductors, communications, computers and software, biotechnologies, and nanotechnologies, for example—spreads beyond the internal logic of scientific and technological research because it affects the production system and the social and subjective processes of selection of goods and services. Technological products hold great market value and become strategic in the commercial competition between companies and/or states as they impose a number of conditions—scientific, technical, legal (patents), and the training of highly qualified human resources—to their know-how process. Technological goods are becoming common in the daily routine of people and create a symbolic and material dependence as they become vital elements in the progressive composition of the human world. The degree of impact and the extrapolation of these innovations to other institutional spaces, such as different levels of political decision and commercial regulation and approval, is a determinative trait of disruptive technologies.
The idea of disruptive technology was originally conceived by Clayton M. Christensen in his book The Innovator's Dilemma, and then redefined—in the work The Innovator's Solution—as disruptive innovation. Its objective was to analyze the impact of technological transformations on the organization and dynamics of companies. Such approach highlights technological transformations as one of the basic conditions in modern economy and challenges approaches according to which innovation processes or technologies follow a continuous and regular development movement. Historically, technological changes withhold the relative balance of the set of processes that materialize products and services. A given technology is not merely the final materialization of a product, but a set of interconnected activities, such as research, labor, management, capital, infrastructure, information, and consumption. In The Innovator's Dilemma, Christensen typifies the diversity of arrangements and technological processes in two ways: established technologies, and disruptive technologies. The first follow their path by means of improvements, with technical increases within an established standard or according to a traditional manner of conceiving, producing, and selling an article. This occurs without great disruptions in the way by which things are done, in the organization of the market, and in the consumption culture of those technologies. Disruptive technologies cause significant changes in the projects and manufacturing processes of material culture articles. These products either create new markets or impose strong impacts on the symbolic attributions, social differentiation, and individual indulgence of consumers, as a function of their operational improvements, functionality, and accessibility.
...
- Art, Design, and Materials
- Bionanotechnology Centers
- Context
- Clinton, William J.
- Converging Technologies
- Feynman, Richard
- Fullerene
- Human Enhancement
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Microscopy, Atomic Force
- Microscopy, Electron (Including TEM and SEM)
- Microscopy, Exotic
- Microscopy, Optical
- Microscopy, Scanning Probe
- Microscopy, Scanning Tunneling
- Nanobiotechnology
- Nanohype
- Nanomaterials
- Nanotech Chronicles, The
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Prey
- Roco, Mihail
- Self-Replication
- Social Movements and Nanoscience
- Technology Assessment
- Technoscience
- Economics and Business
- Agrifood
- Artificial Intelligence
- Benny the Bear
- Commercial Incubators
- Commercialization
- Competitiveness and Technonationalism
- Computational Nanotechnology
- Consumer Products Inventory
- Corporate Research and Development
- Electronics and Information Technology
- Energy
- Entrepreneurs in Nanoscience
- Export Controls
- Food
- Food Packaging
- General Purpose Technology
- Globalization
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- IPOs of Nanofirms
- L'Oréal
- Lux Research
- Magic Nano
- Market Projections
- Market Resistance and Acceptance
- Nano-Bible
- NanoBusiness Alliance
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanointermediaries in Commerce
- Nanomanufacturing
- Nanomaterials in Commerce
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotechnology in Manufacturing
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Patent Class
- Patents
- Publicly Traded Nanofirms
- Titanium Dioxide
- Venture Capital
- Workers' Rights
- Workforce Development and Training
- Zinc Oxide
- Engagement and the Public
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Consensus Conference on Nanotechnology
- Democs
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- Hyle
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Nanoforum
- Nanologues
- Nanoscale Undergraduate Education Program
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering
- National Citizens' Technology Forum
- Popular Culture
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Understanding of Nanotechnology
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Public Well-Being
- Science Cafés
- Environment and Risk
- “Grey Goo” Scenario
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Desalinization
- Environment Canada
- Environmental Benefits
- Environmental Defense Fund
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Germany)
- Green Nanotechnology
- Health and Environmental Risks (Netherlands)
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- International Risk Governance Council
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Magic Nano
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Nano Risk Framework
- Nanomedicine, Toxicity Issues of
- Nanophotovoltaics
- Nanotech Environmental, Health, and Safety Roadmap
- Nanotoxicology
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement (U.S.)
- Risk Amplification
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Attenuation
- Risk Communication
- Risk Governance
- Risk Management
- Risk-Benefit Perceptions of Nanotechnology
- Water Purification
- Ethics and Values
- Access
- Bioethics
- Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (Australia)
- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy
- Codes of Conduct, Corporate
- Codes of Conduct, Professional
- Environmental Ethics/Philosophy and Nanotechnology
- Equity
- Ethics and Risk Analysis
- Human Enhancement, Biological Risks
- Journal of Lutheran Ethics
- Nano-Ethics
- NanoEthics
- Nanoethics Group
- NanoEthics Network
- NanoEthicsBank
- Nanomedicine, Ethical Issues of
- Nanoscientists as Moral Agents
- Nanoweapons, Ethical Issues of
- Neuroethics
- Privacy
- Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- Public Engagement
- Public Value Mapping
- Public Values
- Security
- Speculative Ethics
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- Geographies and Distribution
- Argentina
- Australia
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Brazil
- California
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Canada
- China
- European Union
- France
- Geopolitical Implications
- Germany
- Global Value Chains
- Globalization
- Grenoble
- India
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- International Development
- iPod Nano
- Iran
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Mexico
- Nanodistricts
- Nanoenabled Products in Commerce
- Nanogate (Tribological Coating for Automobiles)
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Victoria
- Netherlands
- New York
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Russia
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Trade Secrets and Nanotechnology
- United Kingdom
- United Nations Millennium Development Goals
- United States
- Governance
- 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act of 2003
- Anticipatory Governance
- Arms Control
- Berkeley, California, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, Local Regulatory Efforts
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Congressional Nanotechnology Caucus
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
- Department of Agriculture (U.S.)
- Department of Defense (U.S.)
- Department of Energy (U.S.)
- Department of Health (UK)
- Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Germany)
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
- Food and Consumer Goods Authority (Netherlands)
- Food and Drug Administration (U.S.)
- German Research Foundation
- Governance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congressional
- Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency
- Law
- Ministry of Defence (UK)
- Ministry of Environment (South Korea)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (Brazil)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (South Korea)
- Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies
- Moratorium
- Nanotechnology Law and Business
- Nanotechnology Promotion Act of 2002 (South Korea)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (U.S.)
- National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Development Plan (South Korea)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Brazil)
- National Research Council (Canada)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- National Toxicology Program (U.S.)
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (U.S.)
- Reflexive Governance
- Regulation (Europe)
- Regulation (U.S.)
- Risk Governance
- Sixth Framework Programme
- Technological Determinism
- Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
- Toxic Substances Control Act and Nanotechnology
- Woodrow Wilson International Center
- History and Philosophy
- “Nano Culture”
- Bainbridge, William
- Control
- Converging Technologies
- Drexler, K. Eric
- Emergence
- Engines of Creation
- Feynman, Richard
- Future
- Historical Examples of Nanomaterials
- History-in-the-Making
- IBM
- Indigenous Nanotechnology
- Joy, Bill
- Kabbalah
- Kroto, Sir Harry
- Kurzweil, Ray
- L5 Society
- Nanophilosophy
- Nordmann, Alfred
- Novelty
- Roco, Mihail
- Smalley, Richard
- Taniguchi, Norio
- Transhumanism
- Integration and Interdisciplinarity
- Nanotechnology Companies
- Nanotechnology Organizations
- Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Forum
- Australia Nanobusiness Forum
- Australian Office of Nanotechnology
- Australian Research Council Nanotechnology Network
- Canadian NanoBusiness Alliance
- Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU)
- Center for Nanotechnology in Society (UCSB)
- Center for Responsible Nanotechnology
- Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology
- Center on Nanotechnology and Society (Kent School of Law)
- Commission for Atomic Energy (France)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization
- Community Research and Development Information Service
- Foresight Institute
- Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project
- International Council on Nanotechnology
- International Nanotechnology and Society Network
- International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
- Iran Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee
- Latin American Nanotechnology and Society Network (Mexico)
- Nanobase
- Nanoparticle Occupational Safety and Health Consortium
- Nanotechnology Business Alliance
- Nanotechnology Engagement Group (Involve)
- Nanotechnology Enterprise
- Nanotechnology Foundation of Texas
- Nanotechnology Group
- Nanotechnology Industries Association
- Nanotechnology Institute (ASME)
- Nanotechnology Issues Dialogue Group (UK)
- Nanotechnology Safety for Success Dialogue (Food Industry)
- NanoTrust Project (Austria)
- National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (U.S.)
- National Nanotechnology Initiative (U.S.)
- National Program of Nanotechnology (Brazil)
- National Science Foundation (U.S.)
- Society for Nanoscience and Technology
- VISION Online
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches