Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Issues of professional ethics in nanotechnology arise from certain well-known features of emerging nanotechnology enterprises. Nanotechnology is at its core multidisciplinary, which presents a challenge when depending on shared standards for responsible conduct. Research and development bring together scientists and engineers from different scientific disciplines and engineering specialties. Accordingly, these professionals reflect the values, commitments, and practices of different scientific and engineering communities. Among these communities there are not only differences of language, but also differences in standards, methods, and values.

Work at the intersections can be highly stimulating, even exciting, so that engineers and scientists may not be sufficiently aware of their differences. However, from these differences, misunderstandings, and even conflict, can arise. In these intersections, sometimes referred to as trading zones, professionals can forge the common understandings in language, methods, values, and standards that are required for responsible, fruitful collaboration. The need for shared professional standards confronts additional complexities. Research and development go forward in many different kinds of environments, in universities, in a facilities network such as the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), in business organizations, in government laboratories (e.g., Argonne), and in government agencies. Within these categories, there are important differences. For example, large, established business organizations, such as DuPont, have procedures and practices for managing risks of technological innovations. These organizations with large financial stakes and experience with innovations that caused problems, such as Teflon caused DuPont, are more hospitable to professional standards than small start-up companies.

The latter fast-moving, risk-taking business enterprises are common in the commercialization of nanotechnology. The requirement to accommodate professional standards or develop company guidelines for responsible conduct faces obstacles in these organizations.

Another important feature of nanotechnology is its enabling capability. There appears to be a prospect for nanotechnology development in almost every sphere of activity and production. Industrial processes, sports equipment, cosmetics, optics, energy, computing, medicine, dentistry, clothing, food packaging, and agriculture are among the areas already engaged or prospective. This great range of areas for or in development presents at least as great a range of settings for accommodating professional standards. Yet professional standards assume importance because they apply across individual organizations and provide standards for responsible conduct to engineers and scientists wherever they may be employed.

VivianWeil Illinois Institute of Technology

Further Readings

Commission of European Communities. “Commission Recommendations of 07/02/2008 on Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnology Research.”http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf (cited November 2009).
European Commission Nanotechnology. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/index_en.html (cited November 2009).
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading