Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Manipulation in a broad sense refers to a manifestation aimed at influencing somebody to act or react in a desired manner. In a narrower sense, manipulation refers to a specific type of social influence that reveals when somebody has a nondisclosed motive for controlling or contriving somebody else into doing something that benefits the manipulator and not the manipulated, who is sometimes even unaware of the structure and effects of the manifestation. What most significantly distinguishes manipulation from other types of social influence, such as persuasion, are the components of nondisclosure and self-interest. In this context, propaganda refers to a possible but not necessary aspect of manipulation, that is, a piece of information aimed at altering public opinion by use of media. Musical manipulation transpires when music acts as part of the manifestation of manipulation.

On the most general level, musical manipulation is enforced. It is not the listener's decision that music should appear in the particular setting, such as in a commercial, shop, or prison. The music is out of the listener's immediate control. Furthermore, to a reasonable approximation, music for manipulation operates more as a reinforcer than a direct message. Music for manipulation typically supplements an activity that already has importance. The music does not cause the situation, and the situation would most often take place without the presence of music. Hence, listening to music is not normally the preferred activity of listeners exposed to musical manipulation. Alongside nondisclosure and self-interest, these general characteristics of the relationship between the music and the listener may help explain why, within academia, musical manipulation has been relatively ignored.

Stanford Prison Experiment

Apart from these general characteristics, musical manipulation extensively varies. Therefore, as suggested by Steven Brown, in order to obtain a more detailed understanding, music manipulation should preferably be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. One example of musical manipulation is the deployment of music during the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE), led by Philip Zimbardo in 1971.

Commentators of this study have not routinely considered music a significant feature, and the study is not on music, let alone musical manipulation. The study examines the suggestion that the personality of prisoners and guards are the chief cause of abusive behavior in prisons. It demonstrates how “normal” college students, randomly assigned to embrace the role of “guards” in a simulated prison, show cruelty toward other students randomly assigned as “prisoners.” The study had to be prematurely discontinued after 6 out of 14 days because of the escalating brutality of the “guards” and increasingly demoralized state of the “prisoners.”

The lack of interest in the use of music in the SPE so far is indicative of the ability of musical manipulation to function under the radar of critical judgment of not only the manipulated, but also the commentators of the settings in which the music is organized. Although the study is not focused on music, it is highly illustrative of various dimensions of musical manipulation. Following descriptions by Philip Zimbardo, music is deployed in two different ways during the study.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading