Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Ethnocentricity refers to the bias of drawing from one's own cultural norms and values when attempting to describe, understand, and evaluate any culture, social group, tradition, artifact, or behavior. Such bias may privilege one's own culture and its associated practices and behaviors and consider “foreign” cultural practices such as music as “primitive” or otherwise undeveloped. Ethnocentricity also occurs when evaluating one's own culture or social group, socioeconomic class, religion, age, or gender. The term originated in the field of anthropology early in the 20th century, motivated by discussions of colonialism, folklore, and the observation that certain cultural practices or groups were disappearing. The term, however, appears in many fields of study, ranging from politics to musicology. Epistemologically, ethnocentric analyses misleadingly imply that every society follows the same developmental path, beginning from “primitive” societies through to more advanced industrial societies that contain formal institutions of scholarship. The term primitive is often ascribed to societies that are not reliant on large industry and technology but may also be ascribed to music and art forms that do not adhere to the same conventions as those in dominant societies, such as Western tonal music.

Ethnocentricity creates a strong sense of group solidarity and superiority on the one hand, but blinds one from fully understanding other cultures, engendering multiple forms of chauvinism and prejudice, including nationalism, tribalism, racism, various phobias, sexism, and disability discrimination. In extreme cases it leads to wars, religious and racial conflicts, or even genocide. Increasing globalization has not been a simple merging of cultures from around the world; rather, dominant cultural values are imposed on nondominant cultures. In order to understand cultural diversity, some scholars have adopted a stance known as cultural relativism, whereby every culture is examined within its own social context in its own terms, and absolute cultural standards are avoided.

Music—far from being a universal language—is also highly susceptible to ethnocentric analyses. As such, many ethnomusicologists have also adopted a stance of cultural relativism in their examinations of the music of non-Western societies. Examples of both ethnocentric and cultural relativist approaches can be found in studies on colonialism, nationalism, globalization, and music industries.

Colonialism and Nationalism

Some scholars argue that music listening and music research are inherently ethnocentric, and that all perceptions and observations necessarily reflect cultural expectations and biases. The field of musicology has been especially concerned with such bias, which was most starkly evident in early discussions of the music of indigenous populations by colonialists. In the 19th century, with the pioneer studies of Alexander John Ellis, Theodore Baker, and Carl Stumpf, studies of “the other's” were called “comparative musicology” and, in 1950, “ethno-musicology” by Jaap Kunst, which soon changed to “ethnomusicology” under musicology.

The discipline evolved in many aspects under the influence of the general approaches from the social sciences as well as with contributions from non-Western scholars, through which the understanding of ethnocentricity and cultural relativity can be traced. Initially the object of the music studies was determined according to geography, focusing on non-Western lands; ethnicity that covers the Oriental, indigenous peoples and “primitive” tribes; and social-class covering illiterate and lower socioeconomic classes, often referred to as “folk.” Later, this ethnocentric approach changed as the definition of ethnomusicology evolved. The object of study now extends to all musics of the world, exploring their cultures with comparative and relativistic approaches by using the techniques of ethnography. Thus, after the emphasis is on the methodology and research techniques, ethnomusicology is mostly called musicology, because the object is no more limited to certain music, although the distinction remains at an institutional level.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading