Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The emotional significance of music has been a topic of scholarship for centuries. For example, Plato and Aristotle thought that happy music tends to make people happy and sad music tends to make people sad. But is this plausible? Notwithstanding that musical sounds can arouse human emotions, what, specifically, is there to be happy or sad about/in musical sounds alone? In reality, nothing of human consequence has happened to cause one to feel happy or sad. Or has it? Part of the answer to this query lies in understanding the connection between music and empathy.

The word empathy did not emerge in the English language until the early 1900s. Nevertheless, though the concept of empathy is recent, it is extremely likely that empathy has been part of the human repertoire of emotions and dispositions since the earliest ancestor humans emerged from Africa. If not, what motivated and enabled human ancestors to live with each other in their communities for the shared purposes of growing, surviving, and reproducing? In other words, empathy is not only a feeling; it is a practical necessity and a “tool” for relating to others and making one's way in the world. And so is music. Music is a social practice that people make and listen to with and for others. Examining music through the lens of empathy, and vice versa, is one way of bringing the nature and values of empathy into sharper focus, because, for one thing, music and empathy are intersubjective and interpersonal processes. However, to understand these connections a little more deeply, empathy needs to be examined from additional perspectives.

The phenomenon and concept of empathy has puzzled philosophers and psychologists for centuries. Until recently, scholars have made little progress in understanding what empathy involves.

Philosophical Theories of Empathy

In philosophical discourse, empathy began as a category of aesthetics. The English concept of empathy derives from the Greek pathos (feeling for) and the German einfühlung (feeling into). The idea of empathy as “feeling into” was first evident in considerations of nature, works of art, and the thoughts and feelings of others. Also, German literary theorists and poets began to “project” subject onto object, which in turn led to the idea that natural objects and artworks possess “aesthetic value.” According to German philosophy generally, and Enlightenment aesthetics particularly, empathy enables perceivers to experience aesthetic satisfaction. In contemporary terms, an object or artwork does not possess aesthetic satisfaction in and of itself—satisfaction occurs at the nexus of an artwork and the self's empathy as “given to” a work.

This kind of thinking led to phenomenological considerations of empathy in the sense that when one is able or willing to feel into or empathize with an artwork or person, one begins to understand affectively the “other.” Current perspectives in phenomenology capitalize on this self-other intersubjectivity. Many phenomenologists argue that empathy is an intentional act toward another insofar as one person experiences another as someone who possesses corporeal, affective, and intellectual attributes that are recognized and understood, consciously or unconsciously, as relating to or mirroring oneself.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading