Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In a general sense, dissociation describes the separation of any types of phenomena that are usually integrated. One usage occurs in neuropsychology and concerns dissociation between neural functions such as those associated with music and language, often following stroke or other brain injury. A dissociation between functions occurs when an impairment is observed for one function (e.g., music) but not another function (e.g., language). Although Oliver Sacks famously described dissociations in his case studies of brain-injured individuals, dissociation of functions can also be demonstrated by differential developmental trajectories or induced by experimental tasks or procedures administered to research participants.

Another common (psychological) usage of the term refers to a disconnection between normally integrated mental processes that serve to alter conscious awareness. No all-inclusive psychological definition of dissociation exists. It has been variously conceptualized as trait, state, process, category, and continuum. Dissociative experiences are commonly categorized as either pathological or nonpathological. Pathological manifestations of dissociation have constituted the main focus of research attention within psychology, but within the last decade, the role of nonpathological dissociation in daily life has been increasingly recognized.

Music's dissociative potential has received less acknowledgement than its capacity to afford absorption. Cross-culturally, dissociation has long been accepted as an intrinsic component of possession trances featuring music. Dissociation is increasingly recognized as key to the phenomenology (subjective feel) of many everyday musical experiences, enabling individuals to escape or detach from aspects of self, activity, or situation. Dissociative experiences with music may be positively or negatively valenced or feature an absence of valence.

Definitions

In neuropsychology, operationalization of the term dissociation has been broad ranging. The most straightforward example of dissociation in relation to music occurs in the area of brain lesion studies. Brain injury can affect music processing but leave language processing intact, suggesting that music and language are handled in distinct parts of the brain. Subsystems of music may also be dissociated. Brain injury may leave melodic processing impaired but rhythm processing intact and vice versa. Dissociation can also be demonstrated in other ways: two brain functions may exhibit different developmental trajectories; some task may interact with one function (e.g., cause a distraction effect) but not another function, and brain stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct-current stimulation) may be used to temporarily inhibit or excite one function while not affecting another function.

A logical problem with such evidence, however, is that apparent dissociations appear when the tasks used to evaluate two functions are not matched in overall difficulty. Brain injury may lead to impairment in the ability to detect small changes in pitch but intact ability to judge emotion in music. Does this mean melody perception and emotion processing are handled in distinct areas of the brain? Not necessarily: There are many redundant attributes of music that permit emotional decoding, which make it a relatively easy task, but even a modest impairment in pitch discrimination will lead to impaired melodic processing.

To overcome this challenge, researchers often seek evidence for a double dissociation. A double dissociation describes two individuals with opposite patterns of dissociation. Two functions (such as rhythm and melodic contour) are doubly dissociated if one individual exhibits significantly reduced capacity for one function (e.g., rhythm) but not another function (e.g., melodic contour) and the other individual shows the opposite pattern of deficit. Double dissociations are considered the strongest possible evidence that two functions recruit distinct circuitry in the brain because differences in task difficulty cannot simultaneously account for both cases.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading