Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Music can be construed in a number of ways, for example, as sounds, as notations in a printed score, or as a category of human behavior. It is this last conception that best describes music if it is considered to be a variety of communication. In this entry, music is viewed fundamentally as based in actions and, in particular, actions that take place among people rather than actions restricted to a single person. This entry places music within broader categories of human interaction and communication and outlines research viewing musical communication as related to language, as making use of the communicative possibilities afforded by musical structure, as structuring and facilitating interpersonal coordination, as communicating emotion, and as bearing meaning. This entry can only introduce and briefly gloss these topics and their relationship to the behavioral sciences; fuller treatments can be found in the suggestions for further reading found at the end of this entry.

Some readers may wonder about whether nonhuman species have music. Many species of animals communicate; however, human communication is different in many ways from communication in other species, even humans' closest primate relatives. For this and other related reasons, the question of whether nonhuman species have music is unresolved at the present time. This entry is limited to human communication in, with, and through music.

Communication: Action and Coordination

To discuss the communicative aspect of music, one must first have some definition of communication. Communication is defined here as action that brings about an alignment or coordination of states among individuals. This definition, though not novel, is broader than those that take communication to be the transmission of information by one individual and its reception by another, with language being the paradigmatic case. Communication as the alignment of states among individuals has been explored at length by a variety of scholars, including those working in the area of pragmatics of language. Pragmatics can be thought of as the study of how language is used in a given context to communicate a speaker's intent to a hearer. Pragmatics considers aspects of meaning that are not explicitly a part of a speaker's utterance but that are inferred by a hearer and looks at many types of language beyond statements and questions. These include speech acts such as performatives (e.g., “I dub thee knight”), irony, and humor. Pragmatics also deals with nonverbal, ostensive communication, as when a man stands before an open window and breathes in deeply, communicating to his partner things not explicitly stated (relaxation, enjoyment of the sea air, and the like). Such expressive acts are common and effective, and the evocative power of human communication owes much to their use. Musical activities share much in common with these expressive linguistic and nonlinguistic behaviors in that they are overt displays inviting listeners to engage in interpretive, inferential activities beyond, and even in the absence of, a specific, unambiguous meaning. This floating intentionality of music is central to its breadth of applicability and its sense of meaningfulness—those aspects that bring forth the opinion that music is a universal language.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading