Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, or the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, was a clinical study conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama. Because of its racism, dehumanization, and insensitivity, it is often referred to as America's Nuremberg. The U.S. PHS worked with the Health Department of Macon County and the Rosenwald Foundation on this experiment, a nontherapeutic study that examined the natural progression of untreated syphilis in African American men. Working with the Tuskegee Institute, the PHS enrolled a total of 600 poor, rural African American males. This ethically controversial study, which did not offer its subjects any treatment, led to the establishment of the Office for Human Research Protections and the Institutional Review Boards’ requirements that studies involving human subjects must abide by.

The Tuskegee Experiment stemmed from a report published in Norway in 1928. It examined the progress of untreated syphilis in white males. Although the study was valuable for its size, including several hundred subjects, it was inconclusive because the study did not observe how the disease manifested longitudinally. To advance this Norwegian case study, the U.S. PHS embarked on its own study. The study was designed to observe the development of the illness in patients for more than six months but less than nine months and treat them with what were at the time considered to be the most appropriate methods, such as Salvarsan and mercurial or bismuth ointments. Even though these treatments were minimally effective and carried high toxicity, they were the best treatments available at the time.

Premise of the Experiment

The experiment involved 600 black men between the ages of 25 and 60. Of these, 399 had syphilis and 201 participated as controls. Over the course of 40 years, they were observed to record how syphilis affected human pathology. Although the men were promised free medical care in addition to hot food on examination days and burial insurance, they were simply told that they had “bad blood”—a general term used at the time to refer to syphilis, anemia, and other illnesses—and never received treatment. No clear and conclusive diagnosis was given to patients. The premise of the experiment was to observe the subjects until their deaths, followed by autopsies to examine the effect of the disease on their bodies; the autopsy examination was part of the requirement for the participants to receive the promised funeral support, granted by the Milbank Memorial Fund starting in 1935.

The research team explained that once the project had identified patients with syphilis, it was no longer interested in them until they had died and their bodies became available for autopsy. During the period of the experiment, a total of 13 reports involving the study were published. Despite the ethical implications of the study, none of these research findings, published in journals such as the Journal of Venereal Disease Information and the Archives of Internal Medicine, were kept secret, hinting at the racist social milieu at the time.

According to the first paper based on the experiment, published in 1936, 84 percent of patients showed signs of morbidity, as opposed to 49 percent of the controls. In 1938, researchers concluded that syphilis reduced life expectancy by 20 percent. The article published in 1955 stated that in addition to over 30 percent of the patients who died directly from syphilis, more deaths may have been accounted by its complications.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading