Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Motion Picture Production Code was a series of regulations that governed the content of films produced and screened in the United States from 1930 until its replacement by the ratings system in 1968. During the 1920s silent era, the Hollywood community gained a reputation for unlicensed decadence. Rocked by scandals such as the death of starlet Virginia Rappe, for which actor/director Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle was charged with manslaughter, the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA) sought to rehabilitate Hollywood's reputation, and under the aegis of MPPDA President Will H. Hays, it instituted the first code.

Hays's reputation as a strict conservative—he had served as President Warren G. Harding's post master general—was useful for garnering public faith in his ability to clean up Hollywood, but the code was in fact drawn up by the editor of the trade paper the Motion Picture Herald, lay Catholic Martin Quigley, and Jesuit priest Father Daniel A. Lord. The studios agreed to adhere to the code, which, under the guiding principle of demarcating good from evil, first put forward a set of “general principles” and then gave a detailed list of what could and could not be shown and said within a film. Although there were expected restrictions on content, such as sex and violence, the code was most concerned with preventing the representation of issues that would undermine the image of a conservative, affluent, and harmonious America, untroubled by social conflict or abuses.

The period from 1930 to 1934 is often referred to as “pre-code” because its strictures were not tightly enforced. During these early years of sound pictures, there was a spate of highly violent gangster films and pictures with risqué sexual content. Miscegenation, or sexual relations between those of different racial groups, was number six on the Code's list of things that “shall not appear in pictures produced by members of this Association, irrespective of the manner in which they are treated.” Nonetheless, The Bitter Tea of General Yen (Frank Capra, 1933) has a highly erotic sequence in which an American girl in China, Megan Davies (Barbara Stanwick), dreams about her warlord captor, General Yen (Nils Asther).

The Letter and the Spirit of the Code

Amid public outcry at the immoral tenor of movies, especially their negative influence on children and young people, and to avoid the imposition of government censorship, the Production Code Administration (PCA), headed by devout lay Roman Catholic Joseph I. Breen and often referred to as the Breen office, was incepted in 1934. From this point on, all Hollywood scripts had to be submitted to the PCA for approval before production, and the completed film required a code seal of approval before release. The code was now applied with full rigor, although its details would be amended as time went on and the studios would find ways to stay within the letter of the code while undermining its spirit.

This latter point may be illustrated with reference to the multicultural issue of anti-Semitism. Two Code strictures coalesced to make it very difficult to address racial or religious prejudice. The first was number 11 of the absolutely forbidden things: “Wilful offense to any nation, race, or creed.” In addition, the Code had a supplementary list deeming “That special care be exercised in the manner in which the following subjects are treated.” Number two of this category was “international relations [which included] avoiding picturing in an unfavorable light another country's religion.” The ban on the word Jew in dialogue on the grounds of avoiding offense was, in practice, taken by the Breen office as an excuse to preclude films from addressing the morally troubling issue of anti-Semitism in the United States or the rising problem of Jewish persecution in Germany. The Life of Emile Zola (William Dieterle, 1937), a parable for contemporary European events made by the socially conscious Warner Bros., looked at Zola's quest to clear the name of the Jew, Dreyfus, wrongly convicted of espionage by the 19th century French military. When looking for a scapegoat on whom to pin the treason, officers are seen looking at Dreyfus's records and tracing down his particulars, pausing at the printed word “Jew” while saying “I wonder how someone like him rose up our ranks.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading