Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Some scholars of mixed race have argued that a unique element of American understandings and constructions of mixed race is that there is an implicit assumption of racial purity, against which mixed race contrasts. At worst, “mixed” has been said to corrupt or compromise the purity of whiteness (thus rendering mixed-race people “nonwhite,” despite any white ancestry that they may have). At best, “mixed” can be constructed as a positive duality or “cultural bridge in human form” that reflects more than one background. Within this spectrum, the tacit presumption of singular racial groups exists, whether constructed biologically, socially, or somewhere in between. “Mixed race,” then, is often viewed as the result of these singular, discrete, mutually exclusive groups commingling and reproducing.

Especially in the last decade, some critical mixed-race scholars have begun to explore the sources for this trajectory of mixed-race construction, how it has influenced the ways that mixed-race Americans have been identified over history, and how they have identified themselves. One of the most important influences on racial understanding in the United States has been the U.S. census. By exploring the race and ethnicity elements of the census as they pertain to mixed-race Americans, the unique identities and experiences of mixed-race Americans throughout this aspect of American history help contextualize the present.

Enumerating Mixed-Race Americans Through History

Mixed-race Americans have undergone shifts in acknowledgment, acceptability, and understanding since the first U.S. census was conducted in 1790. The U.S. census has always been tied to issues of race and ethnicity in the United States. While the primary purpose of the census was originally to count the national population in order to allocate representation, race was designated as a measure of “how much” an individual would count in the total population numbers. Continuing through history, the census has been used to map the different races and ethnicities in the United States, and to measure how each group is doing on the whole in terms of education, employment, income, and health. The census helps shape racial identity as well as illuminate trends along defined racial and ethnic lines. The social constructive notion of mixed race by the U.S. Census Bureau can be described as a “combination” of two or more of these racial groups. Additionally, the census not only describes the population but also shapes categorization and identity, so the implications of the racial and ethnic choices on mixed race in the United States are significant.

The United States has the longest continuous history of dividing its population into mutually exclusive racial categories based on pseudo-scientific racial theories. Racial categorization began, in part, to distinguish between whites and nonwhites, because whites were reluctant to enfranchise nonwhite groups and allow them equal rights and legal protection. The installation of the “one-drop rule” by enumerators, which stipulated that a person was considered “black” if he or she had any black ancestry, worked to reinforce notions of hypodescent and personal identities that assume that any nonwhite ancestry means that the person is nonwhite. This distinction effectively discouraged individuals with mixed-race backgrounds to identify—if even acknowledge—their white ancestry, since it was denied by the larger society. Identifying with other nonblack ancestry would not have been socially or legally accepted at the time.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading