Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Missouri Compromise was an agreement reached in 1820 to address concerns about whether a state would be a slave state or a free state after it was admitted to the Union. Prior to 1820, Missouri was part of the Louisiana Purchase, the territory acquired from France in 1803, and was the first such territory to apply for statehood other than Louisiana. In 1818, Missouri became a state, but there were concerns from states in the north who did not want another slave state to join the Union. The Missouri Territory became a rhetorical battleground for political differences about the role slavery should play in the course of American history. Prior to Missouri's admittance into the Union, there was a balance between the number of states that allowed or prohibited slavery. On one hand, the United States wanted to incorporate nearby adjacent territories as seamlessly as possible; on the other hand, very few wanted to disturb the delicate balance between states that were for and against slavery.

Origins and Enactment of the Compromise

At the time Missouri petitioned to enter into the Union, the country had grown to 22 states. There were 11 free states and 11 slave states, which meant that each position on slavery had equal representation in the U.S. Senate, which gave each faction power to prevent legislation that was not in the best interest of its states. At the same time, the House of Representatives was controlled by the free states because they had larger populations.

On January 13, 1820, a heated debate began in Congress that highlighted impassioned arguments for and against slavery. Not only was black slavery the foundation of the south's economy, but it was also integral to 200 years of southern life and culture. For many in the north who were against slavery, the issue was simple—refuse to allow any more states that supported the abhorrent practice of slavery. In the south, many also thought the issue was simple—Missouri must be allowed to be a slave state not only to maintain its settlers’ rights to own slaves but also to resist any further control imposed on them from the north.

Important questions were raised in the course of this debate: What control did a state have in deciding for itself its own rule of law, even if that law conflicted with laws in other states? If Congress, not the states, controlled the rule of law, would new states have less autonomy than earlier states? Congressman John Taylor of New York articulated this debate in the following:

Those whom we shall authorize to set in motion the machine of free government beyond the Mississippi will, in many respects, decide the destiny of millions … our votes this day will determine whether the high destiny of this region, and of these generations, shall be fulfilled, or whether we shall defeat them by permitting slavery, with all its baleful consequences, to inherit the land.

The debate would continue in public discourse until February 17, 1820, when Illinois Senator Jesse B. Thomas offered the Missouri Compromise. In this agreement, Missouri would be allowed to enter the Union as a slave state, but slavery was prohibited from the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands located north of 36 degrees, 30 minutes north latitude.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading