Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In 1967, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Virginia's long-held ban on interracial marriage was unconstitutional. The court also decided that Mildred and Richard Loving, an interracial couple who had been banished from their home state of Virginia after allegedly violating the state's 1924 Racial Integrity Act, could return home. More broadly, the decision overturned Pace v. Alabama (1883), which set the post-Civil War precedent for the criminalization of interracial marriage.

Loving was thus a landmark victory for the civil rights movement and a defeat for southern conservatives and others who advocated segregation, believed in the natural inferiority of nonwhite Americans, and maintained that sexual relationships between people of different racial, ethnic, or religious backgrounds threatened the moral character of the nation.

The case had its roots in the late 1950s, when the eventual defendants, Mildred Delores Jeter, a woman of African and Native American descent, and Richard Loving, a white man, met in Central Point, Virginia, and began to date. At 18 years old, Jeter became pregnant, and the couple decided to marry.

However, Virginia's 1924 Racial Integrity Act had barred whites and people of color from marrying, so the two instead traveled to Washington, D.C., to obtain a marriage license (where an interracial marriage ban had been lifted years earlier). Soon after they returned to Virginia, local authorities broke into the Loving residence on an anonymous tip that they had violated the Racial Integrity Act.

Violation of Anti-Miscegenation Laws

Richard Loving reportedly presented the marriage certificate to the officer, who in turn claimed that it was invalid in Virginia. Later that morning, July 11, 1958, both Mildred and Richard Loving were taken into custody for violating Virginia's anti-miscegenation laws. Richard Loving spent the day and night in jail, and the pregnant Mildred Loving was there for nearly a week. Both were eventually released and ordered to appear in court for sentencing.

Six months later, the judge of Virginia's Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Leon Bazile, found the couple guilty and sentenced both to one year in prison. However, Bazile reached a plea agreement with the defendants and offered to suspend the sentence for 25 years if the couple left Virginia. The Lovings reluctantly agreed, settled their court costs, and moved to Washington, D.C. Once there, they struggled financially and wished to return to their families and hometown.

Richard Loving even contacted Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. Kennedy referred them to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a legal organization that had developed a strong reputation for advancing civil rights through the courts. Lawyers with the ACLU met with the Lovings and concluded that Virginia had violated the couple's right to equal protection as articulated in the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

By the middle of the 1960s, the Loving case had become a cause célèbre among the burgeoning civil rights movement and proponents of marriage equality. The ACLU appealed the Fifteenth Circuit's ruling, and over the next several years, lawyers Bernard Cohen and Phillip Hirschkop took the case before the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Still, they received no resolution to the case, and it seemed clear that it would eventually reach the Supreme Court. During the appeal process, the Lovings had two additional children and made several illegal return visits to Virginia, though they always traveled separately.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading