Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Intermarriage refers to marriage between two distinct social groups. Most often, this refers to marriage between two people of different racial or ethnic backgrounds, but it can also refer to religion, class, or other status groups. Intermarriage is also referred to as mixed marriage, interfaith marriage, interracial marriage, interethnic marriage, cross-cultural marriage, or, more broadly, exogamy.

Throughout history, social scientists have observed that people tend to marry within their social group or status. Until the mid-20th century, endogamy, or marriage between partners of a similar social group or status, was constrained by both law and social norms. Although partner choice has included marriages across racial, ethnic, religious, and other status lines for generations, such marriage choices were, and often continue to be, grounds for sanction or exclusion from one's family, religion, or social group. Because the United States historically has been most concerned with racial barriers (as opposed to religious or class based), intermarriage in terms of interracial marriage has been of significant interest throughout U.S. history.

Pre-Civil Rights Era

F. James Davis finds that mixed relationships and some intermarriage became common between white indentured servants and slave and free blacks in the 17th century in Chesapeake area colonies. Even though these relationships occurred primarily among the underclass, they were widely condemned and eventually subject to legal sanctions. Moreover, as plantation slavery spread and the number of encounters between free whites and black slaves increased, so did the level of sanctions against mixed-race relationships and intermarriage.

In the wake of the Civil War, most states increased their efforts to maintain the current racial order; this included criminalization of interracial marriage in many states, as well as legal residential segregation, black codes, and other Jim Crow-era policies. Additionally, in 1882, the Supreme Court determined in Pace v. Alabama that state bans on interracial marriage were constitutional. Moreover, groups such as the Ku Klux Klan took to terrorizing blacks as a method of preventing social relations between white women and black men. These vigilante efforts to protect white women also extended beyond blacks to enforce social distance between white women and Mexicans, Chinese, Jews, and other non-Anglo groups.

The world war period, however, introduced a number of challenges to the Jim Crow system, as well as other gender, sexual, and class constraints. The participation of thousands in the war effort resulted in massive residential change, exposure to new countries and populations, a backlash to lynching and other violent terrorist practices, and a broadening of labor force participation for women and minorities in a variety of sectors, including technical and industrial fields, resulting in a boost in the diversification of unions. These shifts were not continuous, however, as Michael Rosenfeld notes; increased suburbanization and residential segregation at the close of the war period temporarily curtailed the expansion of intermarriage until postsecondary education became widespread at the end of the baby boom.

Milton Gordon reports that by 1957, intermarriage even between European ethnics, Catholics, and Protestants was relatively rare, with over 91 percent of Protestants in homogeneous marriages. At that time, 90 percent of minorities were black, distanced from whites by law, social sanction, and often force. Thus, until the 1960s, intermarriage between racial, ethnic, and religious groups was rare.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading