Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In the 50 years following U.S. independence, white settlers expanded beyond the Appalachian Mountains onto lands occupied by Native Americans. In response to the growing conflict between settlers and Native Americans, Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The law sought the removal or acculturation of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole Indians, and perhaps more important, it signaled a new phase of national policy whereby the U.S. government would open land, with force if necessary, for white settlement.

The colonists declared independence from England in 1776 for several reasons. Among the most pointed criticism directed at the Crown was the limit it placed on western expansion following the War of Empire with France and Spain during the 1750s and 1760s. English authorities passed the proclamation line of 1763, making it illegal for white settlers to cross the Appalachians. According to the Crown, the measure minimized conflict on the frontier and thus ensured stable trade relations on the coast. However, after independence, settlers (now U.S. citizens) abolished the proclamation line and streamed onto the western frontier, disrupting Native societies in the process. Not surprisingly, violence between settlers and Native Americans broke out, and fighting around the Great Lakes and the midwest cost the new nation much treasury. Moreover, many white citizens believed that God had offered the continent to people of European descent, while others believed that the Native Americans’ unwillingness to adopt European customs such as private property and Christianity rendered them an inferior population who stood in the way of progress.

Upon entering office in 1829, Andrew Jackson held a combination of these beliefs and was determined to use the presidency as means to open the trans-Appalachian west for permanent settlement. In the attempt to maintain their sovereignty, some Native groups like the Cherokee established representative government, adopted private property and sedentary agriculture, and even practiced slavery. However, Jackson maintained his opinion that whites and Indians could not live together; the latter must vacate their ancestral homelands to accommodate white advancement. Despite some contentious debate in Congress, Jackson's Indian Removal Act put these beliefs into practice.

Indian Resistance

Jackson signed the law on May 26, 1830. Shortly after, the United States began to relocate non-complying indigenous people west of the Mississippi River. Months later, the Choctaws, under threat of coercion, signed the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit. This agreement opened land in the Mississippi territory for white expansion and transferred over 11,000 acres of Choctaw land to the United States. Though the treaty allowed Choctaw Indians to remain in the territory as nominal U.S. citizens, it did not permit the Choctaw to communally work the land, nor did it grant them autonomy over the region's natural resources. As a result, between 5,000 and 6,000 Choctaw decided to walk hundreds of miles to modern-day Oklahoma, a trip that resulted in the death of hundreds if not thousands.

The act also forced the Creek and Chickasaw into negotiations with the U.S. government. The treaties of Fort Jackson and Washington paved the way for additional land cessations from the Creeks and, under threat of military action, the Jackson administration demanded that they too relocate to the newly designated Indian Territory. The Chickasaw agreed to financial compensation but, in violation of the terms, the federal government took nearly 30 years to pay for the land.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading