Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) is a landmark bill passed by the U.S. Congress in 1978. The act limits the forced removal of Indian children from their families and ensures that tribes play an active role in foster care and adoptive placements for Indian children. Though the ICWA strives to protect tribal rights, it has not been well enforced in most states. Indian children are still at high risk of unnecessary removal from their tribes.

The forcible removal of Native American children from their homes has a long history. In the 19th and 20th centuries, government officials, missionaries, and social workers routinely took American Indian children from their homes and placed them with white families or in offreservation boarding schools to facilitate their assimilation into mainstream American society. These removals terrorized Indian families and threatened the future of tribes. By 1978, 25 to 35 percent of American Indian children had been separated from their parents and placed in non-Indian homes or institutions. The out-of-home placement rates for Indian children were 20 times higher than for non-Indian children. Many state laws also prohibited the placement of Indian children with other Indian families.

The Act's Passage and Provisions

American Indian activists began to rally Congress to pass the ICWA to end forced removals and to protect the rights of tribes and children. They demanded the repeal of state laws that made it illegal to place foster children with other Indian families. ICWA supporters also argued that child welfare officials had used ethnocentric reasoning to justify the removal of Indian children. For example, many children were removed from their homes because social workers deemed parents neglectful when they left children with extended family for long periods of time, a valued kin-care practice in many tribes. Similarly, case workers and state officials removed children not for abuse but because many Indians lived in homes that lacked physical comforts. ICWA activists argued that child welfare legislation must prioritize the emotional, not material, fitness of a home, and the rights of the tribe to raise its children. Supporters asserted that these removal practices amounted to genocide. Not only did families and tribes suffer emotionally from the removal of their children, but they also could no longer pass their cultures down to their displaced children.

ICWA passed with almost unanimous support. It had three main provisions. First, before parental rights are terminated in child welfare cases involving American Indians, states must make “active efforts” to provide rehabilitative services for the child's family. If removal is still necessary after these efforts, ICWA specifies an order of preference for child placement. For adoptions and foster care placements, Indian children should first be placed with a member of their extended family. If this is not possible, children should be placed with other members of the tribe, and then with families from other tribes. Foster care and preadoptive children may also be placed in a foster home that is licensed, approved, or specified by the tribe.

The second set of provisions regards jurisdiction over child welfare cases. The ICWA requires that the tribe be notified when an Indian child is placed in foster care or put up for adoption. The act also allows tribes to assume jurisdiction at any point leading up to legal proceedings. If the state cannot determine a child's parents, the secretary of the Interior must be notified and must make efforts to identify and notify the child's tribe.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading