Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The U.S. Constitution was created by people who were influenced by the times in which they lived. One of the most divisive issues at the Constitutional Convention was the question of slavery, yet it could not be easily avoided. Since the economy of six of the original 13 states was deeply dependent on slave labor to work large commercial plantations, none of these states would vote for a constitution that prohibited the practice. Similarly, if the new constitution legitimized slavery, the other states would probably vote against it. Either way, there would be no government.

In the resulting compromise, the final document did not include the word slavery at all. But there were matters related to slavery that, in some form or other, had to be addressed. One of these was the apprehension of runaway slaves.

The purchase of a slave was a costly acquisition. Owners wished to protect themselves against this financial loss. Consequently, without mentioning the word slave, Article IV, Section 2, of the original U.S. Constitution contained the following provision:

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

Everyone knew who the “persons held to labor” were.

Fugitive Slave Act of 1793

Although the Constitution thus protected slave owners against the loss of their workers, the provision did not specify any particular process to assure its enforcement. This was particularly important for slave owners whose property was in states adjoining free states, where escape north was easier, or for those traveling in the free states who wished to take their slaves with them. This, of course, included the president, members of Congress, and other government officials whose duties required them to be in free states. The answer was the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, which was designed to make sure that owners could recover their slaves in any state regardless of local or state laws. Section 3 of the law stated that the owner or the owner's agent could apprehend any suspected fugitive and bring him or her before an appropriate federal, state, or local court. There, upon presentation of oral testimony or written evidence that the person in custody was in fact a fugitive, the presiding court official was required to provide a written certification that would allow the owner or agent to return the fugitive to the state or territory from which the fugitive originally fled. This provided the legal process by which fugitives could be apprehended, identified, and returned.

As a means of enforcement, Section 4 of the act provided that anyone interfering with the process, attempting to conceal or rescue a fugitive, or obstructing the owner or agent in apprehending a fugitive would be fined $500, then the equivalent of about twice the annual income of the average worker. The act was signed into law by President George Washington, who himself tried on two occasions to use its provisions to reclaim an escaped slave who was his servant while he was in Philadelphia.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading