Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Racial and ethnic categories are defined by the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Census Bureau. In the United States today, race and ethnicity are separate identities, and the only ethnic categories are “Hispanic/Latino” or “not Hispanic/Latino.” This practice of separating ethnicity and race, either in general or specifically in reference to Hispanic-ness, has been the subject of criticism by certain groups and members of the public. In the words of the instructions provided by the Census Bureau, today the racial categories in use “reflect a social definition of race recognized in this country and not an attempt to define race biologically, anthropologically, or genetically.” Rather than evaluating claims of racial or ethnic identity, answers depend on self-definition, a change that began in 1970. The Office of Management and Budget dictates a minimum of five race categories used by federal agencies: white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawai'ian or Other Pacific Islander. On recent census questionnaires, respondents have been allowed to select more than one race.

Considering race and ethnicity as completely separate identities is unusually American and has come under criticism by certain groups and members of the public. The OMB's five minimum race categories, while dictated as a minimum set, has had the effect of removing Hispanic or Latino as a write-in race option, to which some had become accustomed. This has specifically been targeted for criticism, as has the lack of an option for Arabs, Persians, and other ethnicities who may not be comfortable identifying as white but do not fall into any of the other provided categories.

Early History of Ethnic/Racial Categories

Race and ethnic data have been collected by the census since the first official census in 1790, when the number of free white males, free white females, slaves, and “other free persons” were among the sets of data determined. The term colored, referring explicitly to race rather than implicitly through the question of slave status, entered the census vocabulary 30 years later with the 1820 census, which also asked about former slaves, a number of states having abolished slavery by that time. Due to growing nativist sentiments and the beginning of the wave of European immigration, the 1830 census added a question about non-naturalized foreigners, though it did not get specific about their ethnicity, focusing on the sheer number of immigrants rather than specifics about their origins.

Over the course of the rest of the 19th century, racial questions became much more specific, as the “colored” category was broken down into black or mulatto, and American Indians and “Chinese” (which included all Asians) were added as possibilities. Non-Chinese Asian ethnicities were added as races with the 1890 census, which added quadroon and octoroon as colored variants. “Hindus” (south Asian Indians), Koreans, and Filipinos were added as races in 1920.

1930s to 1950s

In 1930 a radical change was made in the way race was classified. “Mulatto” was eliminated, and in point of fact, in many ways the concept of multiracial heritage was eliminated, with classifications erring on the side of nonwhite: anyone with American Indian ancestry was considered Indian even if their ancestry was predominantly white, unless he was accepted as part of white society; anyone with white or Indian and black ancestry was considered “Negro,” in accordance to the “one drop rule.” Mexican was added as a race, though prior to this time, and again in 1940, Mexicans had been classified as white.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading