Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Ethics is a branch of philosophy concerned with moral principles and human conduct. Ethical values determine whether an act may be, should be, or should not be performed: in essence, how one's deeds are judged as good or bad within particular norms. Ethics studies have cultural connotations because principles derived from the Eastern origin and those of cultural minorities often differ from traditional ethics of Greek and European origin dominant in the United States. Western cultures adhere to ethical tenets that emphasize the individual's actions and rights, while other cultures regard the collective will superior in ethical decisions.

The study of ethics enables one to understand problems in context and to make informed judgments, whether discussing cultural assimilation or arguing the efficacy of affirmative action. Given today's multicultural landscape, it is essential that an examination of ethics includes both knowledge of the history that produced current dominant norms and an awareness of the issues that arise from cultural distinctions and diversity present in American society.

Historical Origins

Ethics includes rights, obligations, benefits to society, and fairness, and many have evolved and changed during the United States’ history. An abbreviated synopsis of the Western foundational concepts delineates the dominance of individualism in American society, compared to group-centered collectivism of other populations. It is not surprising, therefore, that the root of Western moral philosophy is virtue ethics, which emphasizes the virtues of an individual.

Virtue ethics often begins with Socrates (5th century b.c.e), who held the teleological view that humans have a purpose. Morality was not about obeying laws but about understanding oneself sufficiently to know how best to behave. Plato believed in both empirical knowledge and reason, which he deemed “real” knowledge because it required deep thinking. U.S. citizens have traditionally questioned their lawmakers in his model and often affirm that this right is not similarly allowed in other nations.

Aristotle postulated an examination of the ends: if one chose to do wrong, one must be punished. Decades later the Stoics and Epicureans emphasized pleasure and passion in contrast to Aristotle, but Christianity supplanted these and other early doctrines, and St. Augustine and his contemporaries underscored theology rather than morality until humanism reestablished the importance of the usefulness of one's life.

John Locke believed in natural law, which ultimately inspired the Declaration of Independence concept of “inalienable rights” from Locke's principles of human nature as defined by an inborn ability to reason. From this followed the natural law tenets of freedom, rights to possessions, and the right to life, above even a government's rules. Thomas Hobbes, however, replaced Locke's doctrine with his social contract because he did not believe in society's ability to govern itself without fighting over goods and power.

Hobbes declared that people were selfish, fundamentally unethical, feared misery caused by material desires, and that government was essential to establish strict laws to punish those not in compliance. Immigrants from countries with recent histories of socialism and communism are familiar with and may adhere to this dogma. By contrast, Thomas Jefferson espoused the tenets of Locke's Second Treatise of government because it asserted that people are created equal with equal rights. It remains the cornerstone of American ideology today.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading