Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

By 1852, states began establishing compulsory attendance laws requiring children within specific age ranges to attend school. All states had established compulsory attendance laws by 1929. Although all children were required to attend school, the schools were racially segregated. It was during this time that educators began noting disparities in academic achievement among different racial-ethnic groups.

The most glaring disparity was the significantly lower achievement of black students compared to white students. Educators argued that having racially segregated schools contributed to this disparity because the schools that black students attended were inferior (in buildings and textbooks) to the schools that white students attended. Given this concern, the landmark ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954, 1955) required all schools to desegregate with all deliberate speed. Despite integration efforts, disparities in achievement between white and black students not only persisted, but similar disparities between other racial-ethnic groups also emerged.

While academic performance in all content areas is important, educators and scholars have prioritized student performance in reading and math because they are foundational skills that all students need to be successful in schools. Given the importance of reading and math skills, identifying and addressing the differences in performance across racial/ethnic groups became a major priority. Therefore, to better understand the academic performance of all students, the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) began conducting a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) during the 1970s.

The purpose of the NAEP is to assess the academic performance of a nationally representative sample of students in 4th, 8th, and 12th grade across a range of subject areas to obtain a national picture of academic performance.

NCES reports the performance data for each of five racial-ethnic groups: black, white, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic. To provide a historical context for reading and math achievement across these five racial/ethnic groups, the achievement data is organized approximately by decade depending on the years of testing. It is important to note that NCES did not collect data for all racial/ethnic groups for all years of the assessment. Hence, reading results are available for white and African American students since 1971 and for Hispanic students since 1975. Results for the remaining racial-ethnic groups are available beginning in 1980. Math results are available for all groups since 1978 with the exception of American Indian or Alaska Native; this is again due to insufficient sample sizes that do not permit reliable results.

Reading Performance Across Racial/Ethnic Groups: 1970 to 2011

Since the NAEP in reading began during the 1970s, the reading performance of black and Hispanic students has lagged behind that of white students. Specifically, in 1971, African American students performed approximately 40 points below their white counterparts. From this time to 1988, the performance gap decreased significantly across all grades, such that African Americans remained approximately 20 points behind white students (25, 18, and 17 points behind for 4th, 8th, and 12th grade students, respectively). Hispanic students also performed well below their white peers during this time. Performance among Hispanic students in 1975 was markedly worse, falling approximately 30 points below white students across grades. During the period from 1975 to 1988, however, the gap decreased somewhat, with Hispanic students 20, 21, and 20 points below white students across 4th, 8th, and 12th grades, respectively.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading