Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

For the most part, individuals and families are considered to be poor if and when their income and resources are deemed insufficient for them to “normally” participate in society. Miles Corak writes that identifying and measuring poverty in industrialized countries involves at least three things: identifying and measuring resources necessary for survival; establishing thresholds that distinguish poor from nonpoor; and counting individual adults and children that find themselves below the thresholds.

The low-income cutoff (LICO) and the low-income measure (LIM) are commonly used to do this, and involve the calculation of proportion of income levels deemed appropriate or typical for survival—both measures of low income (or poverty) calculated in relation to other national incomes. A third, market basket measures (MBM), is a budget study of consumption and costs of resources, and is deemed to be a more “absolute” measure of poverty. It too remains in reference to the wider community and social context.

Some economists, such as Amartya Sen, have argued that poverty is much more than low income. In Canadian research, Don Kerr and Roderick Beaujot note that income-based measures of poverty have many well-known limitations, including the assumption of an equal sharing of financial resources across household members. Women, and especially mothers, in many cases continue to be less likely than men and/or fathers not to have or control an equal share of financial resources in two-parent, heterosexual households. The reasons for this are many.

Women and Paid Work

Today, more women enter paid work out of economic necessity and due to the decline in men's earning power. One salary is typically no longer enough to support a middle-class family. The wage gap between men and women has been closing, in part, because men's average wages have declined. Much of this decline is linked to the disappearance of unionized secondary sector or industrial manufacturing jobs, as many of these jobs have “gone south” or offshore, to parts of the world where labor is cheaper.

Most employed women have one full-time, permanent paid job, but a growing number of women work in nonstandard arrangements—a category that includes part-time, temporary, self-employed and multiple-job holders; and this has contributed to a growing proportion of women who find themselves among the working poor. According to Statistics Canada 2000, by 1999, 41 percent of employed women in Canada had a nonstandard work arrangement, up from 35 percent in 1989. Women remain more likely than men to have this kind of employment arrangement, and hold the majority of all part-time jobs.

Women are also more likely than men to have temporary employment. This is due to the changing nature of work and the relatively unchanging nature of family life. The vast majority of women work in the service sector, which now employs about 75 percent of all workers in Canada and the United States. Most of these women do the same kinds of jobs they have traditionally done. That is, about 70 percent of employed women work in teaching, nursing and health-related occupations, clerical/administrative positions, and sales and services. By contrast, these occupations employ a much smaller proportion of men.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading