Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Miriam Johnson was a leading theorist in the sociology of sex and gender, and contributed a significant body of work to the study of heterosexual relations (including traditional marriage and parenting) and gender differences and inequalities. She was born in Atlanta, Georgia.

Miriam earned an undergraduate degree in sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she met her future husband, Benton Johnson. In 1948, the two entered Harvard's new graduate program in the Department of Social Relations. Miriam earned her Ph.D. seven years later, with a dissertation on gender roles of Harvard's female undergraduates.

Inspired by the new wave of feminist writing in the late 1960s and early 1970s, Johnson wrote and taught as a professor of sociology at the University of Oregon. In her 19 years on the faculty, she helped organize the university's Center for the Study of Women in Society. She was adept at drawing together diverse disciplines, applying principles from anthropology, biology, and psychoanalysis to her sociological research.

Her work was so strongly grounded in the scientific method that colleagues commented on her rigor; some of her early work called for a revamping of methods to quantify masculinity and femininity, so that work on gender roles would rely on empirical data rather than complicated and subjective locutions.

Influential Works

Johnson's pivotal book, Strong Mothers, Weak Wives: The Search for Gender Equality (1988), contrasts the power women have in motherhood with the power that is denied them in marriage, and explores the way that male dominance is maintained by the institution of marriage. Johnson posited that marriage, and the traditional constructions of parenting, are structured from a male-dominant vantage point that treats women as juveniles. In her book, she also responds to a number of claims within feminism—denying, for instance, the school of thought that treats motherhood and female sexuality as opposing forces, and in fact ascribes this way of thinking to the influence of patriarchal ideas. Her views somewhat span the chasm in feminism between those who emphasize gender equality and those who promote feminine superiority.

In her survey of various studies, Johnson argues that males (beginning with young children) show more interest in defining, enforcing, and maintaining gender-based distinctions, whether role-oriented (men are firefighters), language-oriented (female actors are actresses), or ability-oriented (boys are good at sports). She looks at three specific structures of behavior to explore her argument: children's play; the institution of marriage, and the way it transfers power from the wife and children to the husband; and motherhood, where women enjoy power, albeit power that is delegated from the father and perpetuates the cycle of male dominance by raising boys who grow up to perceive women in a subjugated role.

Johnson argues that male-dominated marriages are not inevitable given women's role in bearing and raising children and (in distinction to Chodorow) that male misogyny cannot be ended by men taking a larger role in childcare. Johnson argues that fathers, by treating male and female children differently, prepare them for their adult roles: Women are trained to look up to their husbands as they do their fathers, boys to become the peers of their fathers. Male peer groups also play a role by teaching boys what is properly male and what is not, and while girls resist deferring to boys in childhood, they give in due to social pressures by their late teenage years and accept male-dominated marriage as normal.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading