Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

According to the classic work of Diana Baumrind, there are different parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive—a typology based on a two-factor model of control (how demanding parents are) and warmth (parental responsiveness). She noted that permissive parents are high on acceptance/responsiveness, but low on control; authoritarian parents are low on responsiveness and high on control; and authoritative parents are high on both responsiveness and control.

The style believed and shown to have the most positive results on children is authoritative or democratic parenting, which sets and enforces limits; sets expectations that are age appropriate; and involves monitoring, support, affection, encouragement, and appropriate participation by children. In the study, authoritarian parents were the most likely to use corporal punishment or more punitive types of discipline. Classic and more recent studies found social class variations in parenting styles, with working-class parents more likely than others to use more punitive approaches. Some studies found that family poverty and its related stresses, resulting from chronic adverse conditions, also increase the likelihood of parents using a reactive socialization style that often includes harsh, inconsistent, and punitive physical punishment. That said, many parents in poor economic circumstances do not use corporal punishment, and child maltreatment in middle- and higher-income homes is not uncommon. The line between mild and harsh discipline is often difficult to draw, but easy to cross.

Corporal Punishment

For a time, in the West, corporal punishment was seen as a way to civilize, moralize, educate, and correct “bad” behavior in children. For some, corporal punishment continues to be seen as the duty of good parents and teachers, and part of proper household governance. Some continue to believe that corporal punishment is an effective tool in correcting bad behavior, reinforcing respect and obedience, protecting children from harm, teaching life lessons, and preparing them for life's challenges, and is a sign of caring. Opponents of corporal punishment have argued that spanking is immoral, potentially abusive, demoralizing, and ineffective in correcting misbehavior. The Coalition on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth, a national coalition of organizations concerned with the well-being of children and their families, has noted that there is no clear evidence of any benefit to using physical punishment with children, and that it is linked to weaker internalization of moral values. There is also evidence that it places children at increased risk of physical injury.

A study conducted in the United States and Canada noted that most parents want more information on child rearing, including discipline, but few pediatricians discuss it. The study found that 38.4 percent of parents reported using the same discipline that was used when they were children, while 54.2 percent did not. Parents who experienced spanking or yelling in their childhood were more likely to use those techniques on their own children. One-third viewed their disciplinary efforts as ineffective.

In the Joint Statement on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth, coauthored by Joan Durrant, Ron Ensom, and The Coalition on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth, recommends that parents receive more and better parenting education, as studies have shown that parents with knowledge of child development are less likely to interpret a child's drive for independence and testing as bad behavior. In contrast, a parent whose sense of control is believed to be threatened by a child's behavior or who sees the child's behavior as an intentional challenge to parental authority is more likely to use physical punishment. Increased education on child development may help parents feel less frustrated, and less likely to respond emotionally to a child's misbehavior. Some studies have shown that physical punishment often results in short-term compliance and, potentially, longer-term, negative behavioral outcomes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading