Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

DES, short for diethylstilbestrol (or stilbestrol), known as the “grandmother of synthetic estrogens,” was the first in a long line of synthetic estrogens. First synthesized in 1938 to prevent menstrual disorders, it quickly became prescribed widely to prevent miscarriages and enhance pregnancies. However, what was supposed to be a miracle drug became a medical nightmare, as it was the first known drug to cross the placenta during pregnancy. Women who took diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy became known as DES mothers; their exposed offspring are known as DES daughters and DES sons.

DES was never patented because funds for its discovery, received from the British government, required that all discoveries it funded be freely available to the world for production; this made it widely available. Although it was undertested and its efficacy and safety subject to debate, it was produced by more than 300 pharmaceutical companies under many brand names, and was prescribed to millions of pregnant women around the world for over 30 years.

Unfortunately, as some researchers had argued as early as the late 1930s, DES was not effective in preventing miscarriage or enhancing pregnancy. Although it was finally contraindicated for pregnancy in 1971, it continued to be used well into the 1980s. When DES was no longer saleable in privileged parts of the world, it was “dumped” into some third world countries for over-the-counter use during pregnancy. Ironically, while DES was an old reproductive technology erroneously used to support pregnancy, it was also used to decrease breast-milk production after pregnancy, and later reappeared as a postcoital pregnancy preventative in the Morning-After pill.

A Sinister Link Emerges

In the late 1960s, young females began to be diagnosed with a rare and often fatal form of vaginal and cervical cancer known as clear cell adenocarcinoma, previously seen only in postmenopausal women. While physicians were puzzled, it was a mother who was prescribed DES while pregnant who first suggested a connection between her exposure and her daughter's unusual cancer. DES was usually prescribed in the earliest months of pregnancy, when the fetal reproductive tract develops; therefore, it caused cellular and structural abnormalities to the reproductive tracts of the developing fetuses. In a bitter irony, in addition to an increased risk of clear cell adenocarcinoma, DES daughters also have increased risks of infertility, miscarriage, and preterm labor, as well as some autoimmune disorders and breast cancer. DES mothers have an increase in their lifetime risk of breast cancer; other health consequences to DES mothers are suspected and being studied. DES sons are also at an increased risk of reproductive health problems.

This legacy of reproductive woe lives beyond even a second generation. The hoped-for babies of DES daughters that are never conceived, or that die or because of an increased risk of miscarriage or preterm birth, represent a lost part of the third DES generation. Those who survive a premature birth are at risk for both short- and long-term effects of their early exit from the womb; and it is their mothers (DES daughters) and grandmothers (DES mothers) who mourn their loss, tend to their needs, and together experience this intergenerational tragedy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading