Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

While childbirth is certainly a biological event, it also has a sociocultural component that has changed over time to reflect particular historical moments. At varying times childbirth has been a private affair undertaken by a woman alone, an intimate experience shared by two partners, and a grand social event involving friends and family. This shift over time can be seen to correspond to changes in society; the status of childbirth is closely linked with dominant views on how a society sees women and to some degree reflects the overall social standing of women at that time. In the U.S. context, the changing nature of childbirth is apparent. During the 1920s, childbirth became increasingly medical, moving from the home to the hospital. Many have cited the “assembly line” style of care that attended this move, and birthing women became a major commodity in the health care industry. This shift mirrored women's widespread move from the home to the workplace and captured the overall tenor of the time—commodification of women's labor. A similar phenomenon can be seen during the 1950s, when idealized white, middle-class women were embracing domesticity and were striving for lives of suburban disengagement.

During this time, hospital birth became centered on complete pain management. With the advent of highly medical interventions, childbirth became a nonevent, perpetuating the cultural ideals of modesty, privacy and isolation. Gaining popularity during the early to mid-20th century, women were given scopolamine (an amnesiac) together with morphine (an opiate), resulting in a state popularly known as twilight sleep. This practice fell out of favor as its negative impact on mothers and babies was demonstrated (ranging from women's nightmare birth recollections to infant and maternal death) and as medicalized birth advocates championed the reclamation of unmedicated birth.

The ways that a society conceives of and approaches childbirth reflects its broader conception of women and speaks to the social standing of women at the time.

The Landscape of U.S. Childbirth

Since the turn of the last century, childbirth has become increasingly medicalized. Beginning with birth shifting from home to hospital in the 1920s, medical management and oversight has become the paradigm of Western birth. Over the decades, the delivery room has become a site of advancing technologies, and laboring women have witnessed a birth process that reflects these rapid changes. As the field of obstetrics has grown more closely intertwined with developing medical technologies, childbirth itself has become more technological, which has allowed for the routine surveillance of women's birthing bodies through myriad devices. This ability to constantly monitor a woman's labor has fostered the entry of a growing number of medical interventions and has legitimized doctors' increased involvement in the birth process.

Today, with the overall social consensus that hospital birth is safest, this rising rate of obstetrical intervention is viewed as evidence of birth security. Particularly when attended by an obstetrician, a safe birth is seen as virtually guaranteed within the hightech environment of the hospital delivery room. As a result, the vast majority of women continue to choose physician-attended (91.4 percent) or certified nurse midwife-attended (7.6 percent) hospital birth over other nonhospital alternatives (less than 1 percent). These statistics have remained relatively stable over recent decades. Today, over 99 percent of births take place in a hospital environment, and are subject to the procedures and treatments that accompany medicalized care.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading