Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Risk-benefit trade-off refers to the balance of negative and positive effects on achieving a goal, such as health. For medical decisions, a risk-benefit trade-off usually refers to the perception of the anticipated balance of improvements and deteriorations in health from a given choice. For patients, caregivers, and policy makers, this can range from the balance of health in an individual to the overall balance of health experienced by a society. How trade-offs are considered is highly subjective. A risk-benefit trade-off can also consider goals outside of health.

Estimating Future Risk

Medical decisions allow for choices that can affect health. Risk can be defined as the extent to which deteriorations in health are perceived by a patient. Some medical scientists have suggested that risk be more appropriately labeled harm, since this is the direct opposite of benefit. Similarly, risk is sometimes inappropriately described as safety, which is a term used to describe the extent to which harm is absent. Risk is a term that can also refer to the chance of experiencing clinical measures of disease (e.g., disease prognosis such as risk of heart attack). In the context of a risk-benefit trade-off, risk usually refers to the harms experienced by a patient that are directly associated with the decision. They are synonymous with the adverse effects, or side effects, from a medical decision.

Absolute Harm

The chance of experiencing a side effect generally does not change according to an individual's risk of future disease. As such, medical decisions are said to be associated with an absolute risk of harm. The extent to which outcomes attributed to harm are experienced by patients may be affected by other factors, such as age, gender, presence of other diseases, or genetics. Because these adverse effects can occur rarely and are sometimes unexpected, the ability for a decision maker to factor them into a decision may be limited.

Patient Value

It is important to note that harm is subjective and is based on the perceived value of the adverse effects from a medical decision. If a patient believes that an increased chance of experiencing stomach upset is detrimental to health, then he or she would attribute a risk from the medical decision. The extent to which an outcome is perceived to deteriorate health would then equate with the perceived risk from a medical decision. It cannot be assumed that different patients would assign the same amount of risk to the same occurrence of these outcomes. Hence, risk from health effects will be perceived differently by different patients.

Multiple Consequences

Since interventions can increase the chance of more than one type of side effect and these occurrences would normally be perceived as negative, the overall perceived risk from a medical decision may need to consider the range of outcomes relevant to the patient. For example, a medical decision may involve an option that leads to a high chance of stroke and a low chance of stomach upset versus a different option that leads to a high chance of paralysis and a low chance of joint pain. These two side-effect profiles may be perceived as having similar risk to patients.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading