Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)

Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) is a statistical model that generalizes and extends the univariate analysis of variance model. This model is necessary when answers to research questions require the evaluation of multiple outcome measures. While in some cases it may be useful to examine individual outcomes separately, using the univariate model, in many studies the outcomes observed are interrelated. Because of the interrelationship among outcome measures, it is generally more appropriate and meaningful to analyze the outcomes as a composite(s) or weighted combination(s) of the measures using the multivariate model.

While the multivariate model can be applied to a variety of research designs (e.g., between group, repeated measures, mixed model), the focus here is given to posttests-only between-group designs. Furthermore, only a single-factor between-group design is considered. That is, groups are identified based on a single dimension (e.g., drug dosage). Groups may represent existing populations in a nonexperimental study or may be formed through the random assignment of units to the levels of the grouping variable. The same analysis procedures discussed here can be applied to both experimental and nonexperimental studies, with the only difference in application being the inferences that may be drawn from the results. In experimental studies, inferences may be causal, while in nonexperimental studies, only functional relationships may be inferred. The procedures discussed here can be generalized easily to more complex multifactor designs.

Purpose

When populations are compared, they are generally compared with respect to multiple outcomes or response measures. For example, varying the levels of a vitamin dosage (e.g., 500, 1,000, 1,500, or 2,000 IU) may be the grouping variable under investigation, and the consequences of dosage variation with respect to several outcome measures (e.g., Y1 = diastolic blood pressure, Y2 = systolic blood pressure, Y3 = heart rate, Y4 = anxiety, Y5 = mood) may be of interest. Multiple outcomes are often observed because no single outcome measure can adequately capture the intended construct(s) of interest. For example, measures Y1, Y2, and Y3 may be indicators of physical health while Y4 and Y5 may be indicators of psychological health. Both physical and psychological health are latent constructs that cannot be adequately assessed by any single indicator. However, by combining several indicators, an estimate of a construct can be provided. The purpose of MANOVA is to determine the best combination of indicators to estimate one or more constructs that maximize group differences. Measures are combined by multiplying (i.e., weighting) individual indicators by constants (e.g., Z = b1Y1 + b2Y2 + … + b5Y5) to create a composite (i.e., Z) of the outcome measures. The analysis and interpretation of the composites that define the group differences is one of the primary advantages of the multivariate model compared with the univariate model. Other important advantages of the multivariate model include a reduction in the risk of Type I errors and more sensitive (powerful) group comparisons.

Hypothesis Tested

The set of means on the outcome measures within each group is called a mean centroid. MANOVA tests the hypothesis that the populations, represented by the groups, have identical centroids: H0: μ1 = μ2 = … = μj (j = 1, 2, …, j), where μj = [μj1, μj2, …, μjp [.]T = transpose of vector, μjm = mean of population j (j = 1, …, J) for outcome measure m (m = 1, …, p). Using the vitamin dosage example introduced in the previous section, suppose the mean scores for the five outcome measures observed for the group receiving 500 IU of the vitamin equaled 5,

None
2 = 75,
None
3 = 82,
None
4 = 60, and
None
5 and
None
5 = 120; then the sample mean centroid, Y500 = [115, 75, 82, 60, 120]T. To test the hypothesis that population centroids are identical, two matrices are computed, E and H. The E matrix represents a p × p error matrix of deviations of unit scores around their respective group means on the p outcomes. The H matrix represents a p × p hypothesis matrix of deviations of group means on the p outcomes around the p grand means. The elements on the main diagonal of E and H are the sum-of-squares within-groups and the sum-of-squares between-groups on the p outcome measures, respectively, used in the univariate model. The off-diagonal elements estimate the interrelationships among the outcome measures. These matrices are used to obtain a very useful statistic called an eigenvalue, λ. The number of eigenvalues computed depends on the number of groups and outcome measures studied. The determination of the eigenvalue(s) is a tedious task unless only two outcome measures are examined. These computations are best left to a computer. The General Linear Model (GLM) program in SAS and the MANOVA program is SPSS can provide the necessary calculations. Using the eigenvalues, λ, four different test criteria have been proposed—Wilks, Bartlett-Pillai, Hotelling-Lawley, and Roy—to compute and evaluate a multivariate F statistic. The four criteria provide identical results when only two populations (J = 2) are compared. When more than two populations are compared, the four criteria will differ a little but generally lead to the same conclusion regarding the hypothesis tested. All four criteria are reported on SAS and SPSS computer output. The Wilks criterion is the best-known and most frequently cited criterion, but the Bartlett-Pillai criterion is often recommended because of its robustness to assumption violations. The rejection of H0 means that the population centroids are not identical, and there is some relationship between the grouping variable and the centroids.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading