Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a critical element in the eventual outcomes of medical care and public health. Measuring HRQL successfully involves adequate description of health states, distinguishing differences among groups, and detecting change in individuals over time. There are two major approaches to HRQL measurement: psychometric and utility. Psychometric instruments like the SF-36 measure HRQL from a descriptive point of view to capture the various dimensions and generate a health profile. Alternatively, with the utility approach, one measures people's values for health states, also called preferences or utilities. Utilities are measured on a scale where 0 = death and 1.0 = perfect or optimal health. Utilities have a basis in economic theory and decision science and so are useful for calculating the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) used in cost-utility analysis. Because HRQL is inherently multidimensional (vision, hearing, cognition, mobility, etc.), an extension of utility theory called multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) has been applied to HRQL in the explicit multidimensional or multi-attribute sense. This entry focuses on methods derived from MAUT. The health utilities index (HUI) is the best known example of a MAUT-based HRQL measure.

Basic health utility measurement is implicitly multidimensional. As is detailed elsewhere, direct methods like the visual analog scale (VAS), Standard Gamble (SG), and Time Trade-off (TTO) use direct queries about HRQL. With these techniques, people do all the mental processes of weighing multidimensional issues internally and respond with a summary number or point of indifference between choices. For the remainder of this essay, all direct methods are referred to as utilities or utility, though some are more accurately called preferences or values (TTO and VAS). Utilities are technically defined as measuring risk under uncertainty (SG).

MAUT allows the use of SG, TTO, or VAS utilities as a basis for modeling an individual's or a population's overall multi-attribute utility structure. Such models are called indirect since the end user may complete a simple survey from which utility is later calculated. A MAUT-based model can be used to calculate all possible health states in a comprehensive health status classification system, as defined below.

Components of MAUT-Based Models

In MAUT-based measurement, the following four steps are followed:

  • Develop a health status classification system, defined as incorporating all relevant attributes of health and gradations of function or status within each attribute.
  • Obtain utilities for gradations (levels) of function or status within each attribute.
  • Assign relative weights to the attributes.
  • Aggregate the weights of attributes and single-attribute levels of function to obtain an overall utility measure.

The perspective of the population whose utilities are being assessed for the model should be clear. The two most common perspectives are a representative sample of society and a representative sample of clinical patients experienced with certain health states. Health economists generally prefer the perspective of society.

Developing the Health Status Classification System

An example of a health status classification system (HSCS), the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), is shown in Figure 1. An HSCS is developed through the work of expert panels and focus groups of patients or members of society, depending on the model. The HSCS provides a basis for judging the model in terms of face validity (a simple assessment of whether the model seems sensible and appropriate), content validity (the extent to which the model represents the health attributes being measured—evaluated with statistical analysis), and construct validity (how the model statistically correlates with other measures of similar concepts or varies between known groups). Most MAUT HRQL models address overall or “generic” health. A minority focus on specific diseases or conditions.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading