Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The terms efficacy and effectiveness refer to different concepts and are not interchangeable. In general, efficacy refers to whether an intervention works under ideal conditions for a specific outcome. Effectiveness refers to a broader view of the usefulness of an intervention in the routine care of patients in the day-to-day practice of medicine. Efficacy is measured using controlled clinical trials, using specific outcome measures, such as prespecified changes in rating scales or laboratory parameters. Examples of efficacy studies are medication registration trials testing drug versus placebo. Effectiveness is measured by a variety of methods, including synthesis of efficacy and tolerability clinical trial data, clinical trials that incorporate broad outcomes such as quality of life, longitudinal prospective naturalistic studies, and retrospective studies using large-scale clinical, pharmacy, and administrative databases. Examples of effectiveness studies are studies examining all-cause discontinuation in the use of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Efficacy

Efficacy refers to whether an intervention works under ideal conditions for a specific outcome. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration require that medications demonstrate efficacy prior to their approval for commercialization. These premarketing studies are referred to as drug registration trials and generally aim to show superiority of the proposed agent versus placebo. This superiority is measured using a very specific outcome, such as reduction of symptoms using a rating scale designed and validated for that purpose, or a reduction in a laboratory measure, such as decrease in blood cholesterol levels. These clinical trials can be very large, enrolling multiple hundreds of patients across many study centers in several countries. Attempts are usually made to ensure a homogeneous test population. Intervention choice is randomized and subjects are followed double-blind. These clinical trials also monitor for adverse events, usually relying on spontaneous reporting but also including safety scales when certain tolerability problems are anticipated, such as extrapyramidal symptoms encountered with the use of antipsychotics. Clinical registration trial reports include information on both efficacy and tolerability under these artificial study conditions, but the aim of these reports is not to provide a synthesis for clinical guidance but to prove that the intervention is efficacious. Whether or not the intervention is efficacious and effective in a routine clinical practice is not certain. This is especially problematic when the patients who receive the intervention in clinical practice are unlike the subjects who received the intervention under controlled conditions. A good example of this are the registration trials of intramuscular antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar mania. Patients in these trials were required to provide informed consent and may represent a population that is very different from the agitated patient involuntarily brought to an emergency department by the police in terms of level of cooperation, degree of agitation, comorbid medical conditions, and presence of active alcohol or drug use. Perhaps the biggest objection to the use of registration trial data is that the comparator of placebo is not appropriate for the clinician whose main interest is to know how the new intervention compares with the old established one.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading