Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical model introduced by Sir Ronald Fisher that combines features of analysis of variance (ANOVA) with those of regression analysis. The purpose of ANCOVA is to examine differences between levels of one or more grouping variables on an outcome measure after controlling for variation or differences between populations on one or more nuisance variables. The grouping variable often represents different treatments, the outcome measure is the consequence of those treatments, and the nuisance variable either obscures true treatment differences or is a confounding variable that offers an alternative explanation for differences on the outcome other than the treatments.

The ANCOVA model is often underused in experimental research and misinterpreted in quasi-experimental studies. Researchers may not recognize the benefit of using a covariate to reduce unexplained variation among units to increase statistical power in experimental studies. The inclusion of the covariate can substantially increase the sensitivity of group comparisons or reduce the necessary sample size to detect meaningful population differences. In quasi-experiments, researchers may fail to recognize the limitations of the ANCOVA model and overinterpret the results of the analyses. Because of specification and measurement errors, the statistical model cannot totally compensate for a lack of random assignment and equate the populations being compared. However, when used properly, the ANCOVA model can be an essential statistical tool to identify differences among populations on outcomes of interest.

Research Design

The simplest application of this model involves one grouping variable (G) having two levels (e.g., a herbal supplement treatment vs. a placebo), a single outcome variable (Y) (e.g., blood pressure) and a single nuisance variable, referred to as a covariate (X) (e.g., body mass index [BMI]) measured before the formation of the groups or before the start of the treatments. While the application of the model is identical when groups are formed using a random or nonrandom process, the primary purpose and the interpretation of the results are substantially different. When the formation of the groups is based on a random process (e.g., use of random numbers matched with participant identification numbers to assign individuals to treatment levels), the research design is referred to as an experiment and is often represented as follows:

None

where R represents the random assignment of units to the treatment groups; X is a covariate; G1 and G2 represent intervention and placebo groups, respectively; and Y is the outcome of interest. When group formation is based on a nonrandom process (e.g., self-selection) the research design is referred to as a quasi-experiment and is often represented as follows:

None

where terms are defined as above.

Data Example

Suppose a sample of 12 overweight patients having high systolic blood pressure volunteered to investigate the usefulness of a herbal supplement over a 2-month trial period. Half of the volunteers are randomly assigned to receive the herbal supplement, while the other half are given a placebo. Before beginning the investigation, each individual's BMI is computed. When the treatment period ends, systolic blood pressure is assessed. Table 1 presents hypothetical data along with means and standard deviations (SDs). These data will be used to demonstrate the use and interpretation of the ANCOVA model.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading