Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In today's fast-paced organizational environment, the use of teamwork has led to innovative problem solving and high levels of performance in organizations. Moreover, teamwork is one of the most critical components necessary to place a company on Fortune magazine's list of the “100 Best Companies to Work for in America.” According to leadership scholars R. N. Lussier and C. F. Achua, “everyone talks about teams, but it takes more than an ad hoc group of people to make up a winning team” (Lussier & Achua 2001, 249). Business consultant J. Kouzes and leadership scholar B. Posner's research in The Leadership Challenge shows that leadership (and success) is “not a solo act, but a total team effort with winning strategies based on the ‘ We, not I' philosophies” (Kouzes & Posner 2002, 242).

Important teamwork issues include key definitions; reasons for teams, including advantages and disadvantages; stages of team development; types of teams; team leadership; team dynamics; teamwork and change; and rewarding teams.

Key Definitions

Fundamental to the concept of “team” is the concept of “group.” People have often noted that a team is a group but that a group is not necessarily a team. Therefore, one must distinguish between teams and groups.

Psychology scholar Marvin Shaw defined a group as “two or more persons who are interacting with one another in such a manner that each person influences and is influenced by each other person” (Shaw in Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy 2002, 288). The two key components of this definition are the concepts of reciprocal influence and mutual interaction between members.

Business executives Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith defined a team as “a unit of two or more people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals and expectations, for which they hold themselves accountable” (Katzenbach & Smith 2003, 45). The two key components of this definition are the concepts of common purpose and shared goals.

One primary difference between groups and teams is that groups designate a leader, whereas teams have shared leadership in which an individual may take a leadership role, or individuals may take leadership roles, depending on the task and on the individuals' areas of expertise. Members of a group have individual accountability for completing group tasks, whereas team members have shared accountability for setting and meeting the outcomes for the team. In fact, for groups the purposes of the specific work group reflect the purposes of the organization wherein the groups operate. Members of teams develop their own vision and/or purpose and are not constrained by organizational boundaries. Moreover, team members have a shared sense of mission and collective responsibility for carrying out that mission.

Why Teams?

According to leadership scholar and consultant Warren Bennis (1997),

… the more I look at the history of business, government, the arts, and the sciences, the clearer it is that few great accomplishments are ever the work of a single individual, [moreover] … the problems we face are too complex to be solved by any one person or any one discipline. Our only chance is to bring people together from a variety of backgrounds and disciplines who can refract a problem through the prism of complementary minds allied in common purpose. (Bennis 1997, 3)

This reflects the very notion that teams serve organizations much more effectively than a mere collection of individuals.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading