Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Poverty and Inequality

The neoclassical economist Alfred Marshall wrote that “the question of whether it is really impossible that all should start in the world with a fair chance of leading a cultured life, free from the pains of poverty … [gives] to economic studies their chief and their highest interest” (Marshall 1920, introduction). Alongside economists and sociologists, scholars of leadership have dedicated attention to poverty and inequality. James MacGregor Burns, a towering figure in leadership studies, has recently called for the “biggest, boldest kind of leadership [in order to] confront the largest, most intractable problem facing humanity in the twenty-first century: the basic wants of the world's poor” (Burns 2003, 230).

How and whether societies should attack deprivation is a perennial issue facing leaders, policymakers, and citizens. The optimism of the Progressive Era (c. 1890–1925) and the economic growth of the post–World War II period ushered in the possibility that poverty could be virtually eliminated by modernity's advances. Although neither poverty nor excessive inequality has been removed altogether from any society, the degree and quality of public commitment to these issues has made a significant difference in how much deprivation plagues a society's citizens.

Definitions

Poverty and inequality are interrelated but distinguishable concepts. Poverty entails the lack of certain requisites for a decent standard of living. How to define what goods or circumstances constitute poverty is a matter of heated academic and practical debate. Definitions of poverty depend upon a prior understanding of what persons need to live within their society. A bare-minimum conception of poverty is the lack of what is required in order simply to stay alive. Starvation is one severe result of undernutrition and/or hunger, which are forms of poverty. Hunger-focused definitions depend upon nutritional minimums—that is, those nutritional inputs (in terms of calories, proteins, vitamins, etc.) that allow a person to subsist.

Beyond sheer survival, the question of what persons really need in order merely to escape poverty is by no means a settled one. Healthy food and potable water are widely agreed upon as requisites, but also important are decent housing, clothing appropriate for one's climate, and basic medical care. Many social scientists assert (explicitly or implicitly) some “hierarchy” of needs, such as Abraham Maslow's (1954) pyramid of needs, conceptions that place socalled subsistence needs as more fundamental than “higher-order” needs, such as self-actualization. Similarly, most basic definitions of poverty focus on material goods that address physical needs. In the standard, neoclassical model of economics, income becomes the basic currency of analysis; income is seen as a reasonable indicator of utility or welfare. As will be discussed, however, income can be a very imprecise indicator of one's standard of living.

While poverty reflects persons' unfavorable condition vis-à-vis some societal standard, inequality is a concept that has to do with the interrelationships among all segments of a group—the well-off, the poor, and those in between. That is, for any particular good, poverty is a reality of those at the bottom of that good's distribution, whereas inequality is a phenomenon of the distribution as a whole. Even as poverty and inequality often exist together, societies can have relatively high poverty and low inequality (e.g., India), or relatively low poverty (by international standards) and high inequality (e.g., the United Kingdom).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading