Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term intergroup processes refers to what happens between groups of people or between people who are in different groups—how they behave and relate towards one another. Wherever you have groups, small groups such as sports teams, medium-sized groups such as organizations, or large groups such as nations, you have intergroup processes. Intergroup processes affect all aspects of our lives. They play a significant role in prejudice, discrimination, social disadvantage, stereotyping, social protest, political competition, team sports, organizational mergers, and so forth, and even affect the way we define ourselves and form a concept of who we are, an identity. The most widely adopted definition of intergroup processes and intergroup relations comes from the social psychologist Muzafer Sherif: “Intergroup relations refers to relations between two or more groups and their respective members. Whenever individuals belonging to one group interact, collectively or individually, with another group or its members in terms of their group identifications, we have an instance of intergroup behavior” (Sherif 1962, 5).

Relations among people differ dramatically depending on whether those people belong to the same group or to different groups. Within the same group relations tend to be positive: People like, support, and help one another in a general atmosphere of solidarity and cooperation. Relations between groups are entirely different: They tend to be competitive, ethnocentric, and often hostile. The sociologist William Sumner's description of ethnocentrism comments eloquently on the nature of intergroup relations:

… one's own group is the centre of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it …. Each group nourishes its own pride and vanity, boasts itself superior, exalts its own divinities, and looks with contempt on outsiders. Each group thinks its own folkways the only right one …. Ethnocentrism leads a people to exaggerate and intensify everything in their own folkways which is peculiar and which differentiates them from others (Sumner 1906, 13).

From the perspective of leadership it is worth noting that leaders lead groups in the context of intergroup relations and often lead groups against other groups. It is very difficult to have a complete analysis of leadership that is divorced from some consideration of intergroup processes.

Personality and Individual Differences

Intergroup relations are often characterized by hatred, prejudice, and harmful discriminatory practices. Since many researchers argue that people who behave in this way have dysfunctional personalities, it is not surprising that there are many explanations of intergroup processes that invoke personality dynamics and individual differences. The best known of these types of explanations is the authoritarian personality theory put forward by the social scientist Theodor Adorno and his colleagues (1950). Parents who rear their children in a harsh, disciplinarian, and emotionally manipulative manner, the theory says, produce people who are obsessed by status and authority, are intolerant of ambiguity and uncertainty, and are hostile and aggressive toward weaker others. These people have an authoritarian personality that predisposes them to extreme forms of intergroup negative behavior. Other personality explanations focus on the fact that some people have dogmatic and closed-minded personalities, or orientations toward social dominance and myths legitimizing hierarchy, that enduringly predispose them to prejudice and intergroup discrimination.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading