Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Influence Tactics

Leadership involves influencing other people to facilitate the performance of collective work. To be effective, a leader must influence others to carry out requests, support proposals, and implement decisions. In large organizations, a leader must be able to influence superiors and peers as well as subordinates.

The success of an attempt by one person (the “agent”) to influence another person (“the target”) will depend to a great extent on the agent's influence behavior. The most common form of influence behavior in organizations is a “simple request” based on legitimate power. Target compliance is likely for a simple request that is clearly legitimate, relevant for the work, and something the target person knows how to do. However, if the requested action would be unpleasant, inconvenient, irrelevant, or difficult to do, then a “proactive influence tactic” may be necessary to gain target compliance or commitment.

Since the early 1980s, researchers have attempted to identify specific influence tactics and assess their effectiveness. This article will describe 11 proactive tactics that are commonly used by leaders and the conditions in which they are most likely to be successful. The findings are supported by studies involving the use of several different research methods.

Not the cry, but the flight of the wild duck, leads the flock to fly and follow.

Chinese proverb

Rational Persuasion

Rational persuasion uses explanations, logical arguments, and factual evidence to show that a request or proposal is feasible and relevant for attaining task objectives. A weak form of rational persuasion may include only a brief explanation of the reason for a request, or an undocumented assertion that a request is desirable and feasible. Stronger forms of rational persuasion include a detailed explanation of the reasons why a request is important and presentation of evidence that it is feasible.

Rational persuasion is more likely to be effective when the target person shares the same task objectives as the agent but does not recognize the proposal is the best way to attain the objectives. Along with facts and logic, a rational appeal usually includes some opinions or inferences that the target person is asked to accept at face value because there is insufficient evidence to verify them. Thus, the success of the influence attempt also depends in part on whether the agent is perceived to be a credible and trustworthy source of information, inferences, and predictions.

Apprising

With this tactic the agent explains why a request or proposal is likely to benefit the target person as an individual or help to advance the person's career. For example, a requested task may provide opportunities to learn new skills, meet important people, or gain more visibility as a competent professional. Like rational persuasion, apprising often involves the use of facts and logic, but the benefits described are for the target person rather than for an organization in which they are both members. Apprising is more likely to be successful if the agent understands the target's needs and how a request or proposal may be relevant for satisfying them. To use this tactic successfully, an agent must be perceived as credible.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading