Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Economic Justice

The moral philosopher and political economist Adam Smith asserted that “justice … is the main pillar that upholds the whole edifice [of society]. If it is removed, the great, the immense fabric of human society … must in a moment crumble into atoms” (Smith 1976a [1790], 86). What this pillar should look like, and how it should be constructed, are perennial questions that scholars and practitioners of leadership have debated before and after Smith.

In disparate contexts, political leaders and socialmovement activists have pursued the goal of a more just economic system. Examples of such efforts include the Peasants' Revolt in the fourteenth century CE; the American Revolutionary leaders' rejection of “taxation without representation”; Marx and Engels's call for “workers of the world [to] unite!”; President Lyndon Johnson's declaration of a “war on poverty”; César Chávez's leadership of the United Farm Workers' struggle; organizing in factories and beyond to secure a decent wage and safe working conditions; and coordinated efforts to secure gender equity in the workplace.

Economic justice is not only a worthy end; it is also instrumentally valuable in the quest for other valuable social ends. Proponents of a minimum wage, for instance, have argued that some level of income is necessary for citizen-workers to be full participants in the life of their society. Societies in which persons do not receive their due are likely to be marked by unrest, fragmentation, or even violence. Stated positively, citizens who feel they have a stake in their society are able to be active agents in various spheres of life.

Meanings and Fundamental Questions

Understandings of economic justice fit within wider conceptions of a good and just society, about which there is vigorous intellectual and practical disagreement. Economic justice has to do with conditions of a society that enable individual persons to receive their due within their society, under conditions of finite material resources. One of the most basic questions in economic justice concerns which parties have moral status within a society—do all women and men, children, adults, and elderly people, persons of all races, IQs, and sexual orientations have equal claims within the society? Do foreign workers and national-citizen workers have the same (or different) status in terms of economic justice? Do members of future generations have any claim to economic justice? (For example, should their interests be considered in shaping a social security system or in deciding what forms of pollution are morally acceptable?) Finally, do nonhuman beings have claims in justice?

Whether economic justice should focus on opportunities, capabilities, resources, utilities, outcomes, or some other dimension or level is an additional matter of debate. So, too, is how broadly the term “economic” should be taken, since the economic system is closely related to political, social, cultural, religious, and familial arrangements in a society. The criterion of economic justice is another fundamental question: Should a society determine what is due to individuals according to inherent worth, need, social class, merit, work, prior possession, or in some other way?

Yet another issue in economic justice concerns the way in which the analyst relates an ideal conception of justice to the current injustices of a particular actual society. Justice as an end, arguably, is not fully attainable in any human society, and thus a key issue for any view of justice is how to prioritize leadership actions against various forms of injustice in order to approximate conditions of justice more fully.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading